| TODO LIST |
| --------- |
| |
| POW{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, Fn, <Fm,#value> - power |
| RPW{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, Fn, <Fm,#value> - reverse power |
| POL{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, Fn, <Fm,#value> - polar angle (arctan2) |
| |
| LOG{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - logarithm to base 10 |
| LGN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - logarithm to base e |
| EXP{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - exponent |
| SIN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - sine |
| COS{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - cosine |
| TAN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - tangent |
| ASN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - arcsine |
| ACS{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - arccosine |
| ATN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - arctangent |
| |
| These are not implemented. They are not currently issued by the compiler, |
| and are handled by routines in libc. These are not implemented by the FPA11 |
| hardware, but are handled by the floating point support code. They should |
| be implemented in future versions. |
| |
| There are a couple of ways to approach the implementation of these. One |
| method would be to use accurate table methods for these routines. I have |
| a couple of papers by S. Gal from IBM's research labs in Haifa, Israel that |
| seem to promise extreme accuracy (in the order of 99.8%) and reasonable speed. |
| These methods are used in GLIBC for some of the transcendental functions. |
| |
| Another approach, which I know little about is CORDIC. This stands for |
| Coordinate Rotation Digital Computer, and is a method of computing |
| transcendental functions using mostly shifts and adds and a few |
| multiplications and divisions. The ARM excels at shifts and adds, |
| so such a method could be promising, but requires more research to |
| determine if it is feasible. |
| |
| Rounding Methods |
| |
| The IEEE standard defines 4 rounding modes. Round to nearest is the |
| default, but rounding to + or - infinity or round to zero are also allowed. |
| Many architectures allow the rounding mode to be specified by modifying bits |
| in a control register. Not so with the ARM FPA11 architecture. To change |
| the rounding mode one must specify it with each instruction. |
| |
| This has made porting some benchmarks difficult. It is possible to |
| introduce such a capability into the emulator. The FPCR contains |
| bits describing the rounding mode. The emulator could be altered to |
| examine a flag, which if set forced it to ignore the rounding mode in |
| the instruction, and use the mode specified in the bits in the FPCR. |
| |
| This would require a method of getting/setting the flag, and the bits |
| in the FPCR. This requires a kernel call in ArmLinux, as WFC/RFC are |
| supervisor only instructions. If anyone has any ideas or comments I |
| would like to hear them. |
| |
| [NOTE: pulled out from some docs on ARM floating point, specifically |
| for the Acorn FPE, but not limited to it: |
| |
| The floating point control register (FPCR) may only be present in some |
| implementations: it is there to control the hardware in an implementation- |
| specific manner, for example to disable the floating point system. The user |
| mode of the ARM is not permitted to use this register (since the right is |
| reserved to alter it between implementations) and the WFC and RFC |
| instructions will trap if tried in user mode. |
| |
| Hence, the answer is yes, you could do this, but then you will run a high |
| risk of becoming isolated if and when hardware FP emulation comes out |
| -- Russell]. |