| PXA/MMP - DMA Slave controller |
| ============================== |
| |
| Constraints |
| ----------- |
| a) Transfers hot queuing |
| A driver submitting a transfer and issuing it should be granted the transfer |
| is queued even on a running DMA channel. |
| This implies that the queuing doesn't wait for the previous transfer end, |
| and that the descriptor chaining is not only done in the irq/tasklet code |
| triggered by the end of the transfer. |
| A transfer which is submitted and issued on a phy doesn't wait for a phy to |
| stop and restart, but is submitted on a "running channel". The other |
| drivers, especially mmp_pdma waited for the phy to stop before relaunching |
| a new transfer. |
| |
| b) All transfers having asked for confirmation should be signaled |
| Any issued transfer with DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT should trigger a callback call. |
| This implies that even if an irq/tasklet is triggered by end of tx1, but |
| at the time of irq/dma tx2 is already finished, tx1->complete() and |
| tx2->complete() should be called. |
| |
| c) Channel running state |
| A driver should be able to query if a channel is running or not. For the |
| multimedia case, such as video capture, if a transfer is submitted and then |
| a check of the DMA channel reports a "stopped channel", the transfer should |
| not be issued until the next "start of frame interrupt", hence the need to |
| know if a channel is in running or stopped state. |
| |
| d) Bandwidth guarantee |
| The PXA architecture has 4 levels of DMAs priorities : high, normal, low. |
| The high prorities get twice as much bandwidth as the normal, which get twice |
| as much as the low priorities. |
| A driver should be able to request a priority, especially the real-time |
| ones such as pxa_camera with (big) throughputs. |
| |
| Design |
| ------ |
| a) Virtual channels |
| Same concept as in sa11x0 driver, ie. a driver was assigned a "virtual |
| channel" linked to the requestor line, and the physical DMA channel is |
| assigned on the fly when the transfer is issued. |
| |
| b) Transfer anatomy for a scatter-gather transfer |
| +------------+-----+---------------+----------------+-----------------+ |
| | desc-sg[0] | ... | desc-sg[last] | status updater | finisher/linker | |
| +------------+-----+---------------+----------------+-----------------+ |
| |
| This structure is pointed by dma->sg_cpu. |
| The descriptors are used as follows : |
| - desc-sg[i]: i-th descriptor, transferring the i-th sg |
| element to the video buffer scatter gather |
| - status updater |
| Transfers a single u32 to a well known dma coherent memory to leave |
| a trace that this transfer is done. The "well known" is unique per |
| physical channel, meaning that a read of this value will tell which |
| is the last finished transfer at that point in time. |
| - finisher: has ddadr=DADDR_STOP, dcmd=ENDIRQEN |
| - linker: has ddadr= desc-sg[0] of next transfer, dcmd=0 |
| |
| c) Transfers hot-chaining |
| Suppose the running chain is : |
| Buffer 1 Buffer 2 |
| +---------+----+---+ +----+----+----+---+ |
| | d0 | .. | dN | l | | d0 | .. | dN | f | |
| +---------+----+-|-+ ^----+----+----+---+ |
| | | |
| +----+ |
| |
| After a call to dmaengine_submit(b3), the chain will look like : |
| Buffer 1 Buffer 2 Buffer 3 |
| +---------+----+---+ +----+----+----+---+ +----+----+----+---+ |
| | d0 | .. | dN | l | | d0 | .. | dN | l | | d0 | .. | dN | f | |
| +---------+----+-|-+ ^----+----+----+-|-+ ^----+----+----+---+ |
| | | | | |
| +----+ +----+ |
| new_link |
| |
| If while new_link was created the DMA channel stopped, it is _not_ |
| restarted. Hot-chaining doesn't break the assumption that |
| dma_async_issue_pending() is to be used to ensure the transfer is actually started. |
| |
| One exception to this rule : |
| - if Buffer1 and Buffer2 had all their addresses 8 bytes aligned |
| - and if Buffer3 has at least one address not 4 bytes aligned |
| - then hot-chaining cannot happen, as the channel must be stopped, the |
| "align bit" must be set, and the channel restarted As a consequence, |
| such a transfer tx_submit() will be queued on the submitted queue, and |
| this specific case if the DMA is already running in aligned mode. |
| |
| d) Transfers completion updater |
| Each time a transfer is completed on a channel, an interrupt might be |
| generated or not, up to the client's request. But in each case, the last |
| descriptor of a transfer, the "status updater", will write the latest |
| transfer being completed into the physical channel's completion mark. |
| |
| This will speed up residue calculation, for large transfers such as video |
| buffers which hold around 6k descriptors or more. This also allows without |
| any lock to find out what is the latest completed transfer in a running |
| DMA chain. |
| |
| e) Transfers completion, irq and tasklet |
| When a transfer flagged as "DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT" is finished, the dma irq |
| is raised. Upon this interrupt, a tasklet is scheduled for the physical |
| channel. |
| The tasklet is responsible for : |
| - reading the physical channel last updater mark |
| - calling all the transfer callbacks of finished transfers, based on |
| that mark, and each transfer flags. |
| If a transfer is completed while this handling is done, a dma irq will |
| be raised, and the tasklet will be scheduled once again, having a new |
| updater mark. |
| |
| f) Residue |
| Residue granularity will be descriptor based. The issued but not completed |
| transfers will be scanned for all of their descriptors against the |
| currently running descriptor. |
| |
| g) Most complicated case of driver's tx queues |
| The most tricky situation is when : |
| - there are not "acked" transfers (tx0) |
| - a driver submitted an aligned tx1, not chained |
| - a driver submitted an aligned tx2 => tx2 is cold chained to tx1 |
| - a driver issued tx1+tx2 => channel is running in aligned mode |
| - a driver submitted an aligned tx3 => tx3 is hot-chained |
| - a driver submitted an unaligned tx4 => tx4 is put in submitted queue, |
| not chained |
| - a driver issued tx4 => tx4 is put in issued queue, not chained |
| - a driver submitted an aligned tx5 => tx5 is put in submitted queue, not |
| chained |
| - a driver submitted an aligned tx6 => tx6 is put in submitted queue, |
| cold chained to tx5 |
| |
| This translates into (after tx4 is issued) : |
| - issued queue |
| +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ |
| | tx1 | | tx2 | | tx3 | | tx4 | |
| +---|-+ ^---|-+ ^-----+ +-----+ |
| | | | | |
| +---+ +---+ |
| - submitted queue |
| +-----+ +-----+ |
| | tx5 | | tx6 | |
| +---|-+ ^-----+ |
| | | |
| +---+ |
| - completed queue : empty |
| - allocated queue : tx0 |
| |
| It should be noted that after tx3 is completed, the channel is stopped, and |
| restarted in "unaligned mode" to handle tx4. |
| |
| Author: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |