Google Git
Sign in
gfiber / vendor / opensource / netsnmp / ddd10af967ff7361eb0527f61bf9aa55117f1651 / . / doc / rfc / snmpV3 / rfc3414.txt
blob: d3c522b30035aacedbfa45b7ee4531d2377978cb [file] [log] [blame]
Network Working Group U. Blumenthal
Request for Comments: 3414 B. Wijnen
STD: 62 Lucent Technologies
Obsoletes: 2574 December 2002
Category: Standards Track
User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document describes the User-based Security Model (USM) for
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) version 3 for use in the
SNMP architecture. It defines the Elements of Procedure for
providing SNMP message level security. This document also includes a
Management Information Base (MIB) for remotely monitoring/managing
the configuration parameters for this Security Model. This document
obsoletes RFC 2574.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction.......................................... 4
1.1. Threats............................................... 4
1.2. Goals and Constraints................................. 6
1.3. Security Services..................................... 6
1.4. Module Organization................................... 7
1.4.1. Timeliness Module..................................... 8
1.4.2. Authentication Protocol............................... 8
1.4.3. Privacy Protocol...................................... 8
1.5. Protection against Message Replay, Delay
and Redirection....................................... 9
1.5.1. Authoritative SNMP engine............................. 9
1.5.2. Mechanisms............................................ 9
1.6. Abstract Service Interfaces........................... 11
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1.6.1. User-based Security Model Primitives
for Authentication.................................... 11
1.6.2. User-based Security Model Primitives
for Privacy........................................... 12
2. Elements of the Model................................. 12
2.1. User-based Security Model Users....................... 12
2.2. Replay Protection..................................... 13
2.2.1. msgAuthoritativeEngineID.............................. 14
2.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots and
msgAuthoritativeEngineTime............................ 14
2.2.3. Time Window........................................... 15
2.3. Time Synchronization.................................. 15
2.4. SNMP Messages Using this Security Model............... 16
2.5. Services provided by the User-based Security Model.... 17
2.5.1. Services for Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message...... 17
2.5.2. Services for Processing an Incoming SNMP Message...... 20
2.6. Key Localization Algorithm............................ 22
3. Elements of Procedure................................. 22
3.1. Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message................... 22
3.2. Processing an Incoming SNMP Message................... 26
4. Discovery............................................. 31
5. Definitions........................................... 32
6. HMAC-MD5-96 Authentication Protocol................... 51
6.1. Mechanisms............................................ 51
6.1.1. Digest Authentication Mechanism....................... 51
6.2. Elements of the Digest Authentication Protocol........ 52
6.2.1. Users................................................. 52
6.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineID.............................. 53
6.2.3. SNMP Messages Using this Authentication Protocol...... 53
6.2.4. Services provided by the HMAC-MD5-96
Authentication Module................................. 53
6.2.4.1. Services for Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message...... 53
6.2.4.2. Services for Processing an Incoming SNMP Message...... 54
6.3. Elements of Procedure................................. 55
6.3.1. Processing an Outgoing Message........................ 55
6.3.2. Processing an Incoming Message........................ 56
7. HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocol................... 57
7.1. Mechanisms............................................ 57
7.1.1. Digest Authentication Mechanism....................... 57
7.2. Elements of the HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocol... 58
7.2.1. Users................................................. 58
7.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineID.............................. 58
7.2.3. SNMP Messages Using this Authentication Protocol...... 59
7.2.4. Services provided by the HMAC-SHA-96
Authentication Module................................. 59
7.2.4.1. Services for Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message...... 59
7.2.4.2. Services for Processing an Incoming SNMP Message...... 60
7.3. Elements of Procedure................................. 61
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
7.3.1. Processing an Outgoing Message........................ 61
7.3.2. Processing an Incoming Message........................ 61
8. CBC-DES Symmetric Encryption Protocol................. 63
8.1. Mechanisms............................................ 63
8.1.1. Symmetric Encryption Protocol......................... 63
8.1.1.1. DES key and Initialization Vector..................... 64
8.1.1.2. Data Encryption....................................... 65
8.1.1.3. Data Decryption....................................... 65
8.2. Elements of the DES Privacy Protocol.................. 65
8.2.1. Users................................................. 65
8.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineID.............................. 66
8.2.3. SNMP Messages Using this Privacy Protocol............. 66
8.2.4. Services provided by the DES Privacy Module........... 66
8.2.4.1. Services for Encrypting Outgoing Data................. 66
8.2.4.2. Services for Decrypting Incoming Data................. 67
8.3. Elements of Procedure................................. 68
8.3.1. Processing an Outgoing Message........................ 68
8.3.2. Processing an Incoming Message........................ 69
9. Intellectual Property................................. 69
10. Acknowledgements...................................... 70
11. Security Considerations............................... 71
11.1. Recommended Practices................................. 71
11.2. Defining Users........................................ 73
11.3. Conformance........................................... 74
11.4. Use of Reports........................................ 75
11.5. Access to the SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB.................. 75
12. References............................................ 75
A.1. SNMP engine Installation Parameters................... 78
A.2. Password to Key Algorithm............................. 80
A.2.1. Password to Key Sample Code for MD5................... 81
A.2.2. Password to Key Sample Code for SHA................... 82
A.3. Password to Key Sample Results........................ 83
A.3.1. Password to Key Sample Results using MD5.............. 83
A.3.2. Password to Key Sample Results using SHA.............. 83
A.4. Sample encoding of msgSecurityParameters.............. 83
A.5. Sample keyChange Results.............................. 84
A.5.1. Sample keyChange Results using MD5.................... 84
A.5.2. Sample keyChange Results using SHA.................... 85
B. Change Log............................................ 86
Editors' Addresses.................................... 87
Full Copyright Statement.............................. 88
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1. Introduction
The Architecture for describing Internet Management Frameworks
[RFC3411] describes that an SNMP engine is composed of:
1) a Dispatcher,
2) a Message Processing Subsystem,
3) a Security Subsystem, and
4) an Access Control Subsystem.
Applications make use of the services of these subsystems.
It is important to understand the SNMP architecture and the
terminology of the architecture to understand where the Security
Model described in this document fits into the architecture and
interacts with other subsystems within the architecture. The reader
is expected to have read and understood the description of the SNMP
architecture, as defined in [RFC3411].
This memo describes the User-based Security Model as it is used
within the SNMP Architecture. The main idea is that we use the
traditional concept of a user (identified by a userName) with which
to associate security information.
This memo describes the use of HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96 as the
authentication protocols and the use of CBC-DES as the privacy
protocol. The User-based Security Model however allows for other
such protocols to be used instead of or concurrent with these
protocols. Therefore, the description of HMAC-MD5-96, HMAC-SHA-96
and CBC-DES are in separate sections to reflect their self-contained
nature and to indicate that they can be replaced or supplemented in
the future.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
1.1. Threats
Several of the classical threats to network protocols are applicable
to the network management problem and therefore would be applicable
to any SNMP Security Model. Other threats are not applicable to the
network management problem. This section discusses principal
threats, secondary threats, and threats which are of lesser
importance.
The principal threats against which this SNMP Security Model should
provide protection are:
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- Modification of Information The modification threat is the danger
that some unauthorized entity may alter in-transit SNMP messages
generated on behalf of an authorized principal in such a way as to
effect unauthorized management operations, including falsifying the
value of an object.
- Masquerade The masquerade threat is the danger that management
operations not authorized for some user may be attempted by
assuming the identity of another user that has the appropriate
authorizations.
Two secondary threats are also identified. The Security Model
defined in this memo provides limited protection against:
- Disclosure The disclosure threat is the danger of eavesdropping on
the exchanges between managed agents and a management station.
Protecting against this threat may be required as a matter of local
policy.
- Message Stream Modification The SNMP protocol is typically based
upon a connection-less transport service which may operate over any
sub-network service. The re-ordering, delay or replay of messages
can and does occur through the natural operation of many such sub-
network services. The message stream modification threat is the
danger that messages may be maliciously re-ordered, delayed or
replayed to an extent which is greater than can occur through the
natural operation of a sub-network service, in order to effect
unauthorized management operations.
There are at least two threats that an SNMP Security Model need not
protect against. The security protocols defined in this memo do not
provide protection against:
- Denial of Service This SNMP Security Model does not attempt to
address the broad range of attacks by which service on behalf of
authorized users is denied. Indeed, such denial-of-service attacks
are in many cases indistinguishable from the type of network
failures with which any viable network management protocol must
cope as a matter of course.
- Traffic Analysis This SNMP Security Model does not attempt to
address traffic analysis attacks. Indeed, many traffic patterns
are predictable - devices may be managed on a regular basis by a
relatively small number of management applications - and therefore
there is no significant advantage afforded by protecting against
traffic analysis.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1.2. Goals and Constraints
Based on the foregoing account of threats in the SNMP network
management environment, the goals of this SNMP Security Model are as
follows.
1) Provide for verification that each received SNMP message has not
been modified during its transmission through the network.
2) Provide for verification of the identity of the user on whose
behalf a received SNMP message claims to have been generated.
3) Provide for detection of received SNMP messages, which request or
contain management information, whose time of generation was not
recent.
4) Provide, when necessary, that the contents of each received SNMP
message are protected from disclosure.
In addition to the principal goal of supporting secure network
management, the design of this SNMP Security Model is also influenced
by the following constraints:
1) When the requirements of effective management in times of network
stress are inconsistent with those of security, the design of USM
has given preference to the former.
2) Neither the security protocol nor its underlying security
mechanisms should depend upon the ready availability of other
network services (e.g., Network Time Protocol (NTP) or key
management protocols).
3) A security mechanism should entail no changes to the basic SNMP
network management philosophy.
1.3. Security Services
The security services necessary to support the goals of this SNMP
Security Model are as follows:
- Data Integrity is the provision of the property that data has not
been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner, nor have data
sequences been altered to an extent greater than can occur non-
maliciously.
- Data Origin Authentication is the provision of the property that
the claimed identity of the user on whose behalf received data was
originated is corroborated.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- Data Confidentiality is the provision of the property that
information is not made available or disclosed to unauthorized
individuals, entities, or processes.
- Message timeliness and limited replay protection is the provision
of the property that a message whose generation time is outside of
a specified time window is not accepted. Note that message
reordering is not dealt with and can occur in normal conditions
too.
For the protocols specified in this memo, it is not possible to
assure the specific originator of a received SNMP message; rather, it
is the user on whose behalf the message was originated that is
authenticated.
For these protocols, it not possible to obtain data integrity without
data origin authentication, nor is it possible to obtain data origin
authentication without data integrity. Further, there is no
provision for data confidentiality without both data integrity and
data origin authentication.
The security protocols used in this memo are considered acceptably
secure at the time of writing. However, the procedures allow for new
authentication and privacy methods to be specified at a future time
if the need arises.
1.4. Module Organization
The security protocols defined in this memo are split in three
different modules and each has its specific responsibilities such
that together they realize the goals and security services described
above:
- The authentication module MUST provide for:
- Data Integrity,
- Data Origin Authentication,
- The timeliness module MUST provide for:
- Protection against message delay or replay (to an extent greater
than can occur through normal operation).
- The privacy module MUST provide for
- Protection against disclosure of the message payload.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The timeliness module is fixed for the User-based Security Model
while there is provision for multiple authentication and/or privacy
modules, each of which implements a specific authentication or
privacy protocol respectively.
1.4.1. Timeliness Module
Section 3 (Elements of Procedure) uses the timeliness values in an
SNMP message to do timeliness checking. The timeliness check is only
performed if authentication is applied to the message. Since the
complete message is checked for integrity, we can assume that the
timeliness values in a message that passes the authentication module
are trustworthy.
1.4.2. Authentication Protocol
Section 6 describes the HMAC-MD5-96 authentication protocol which is
the first authentication protocol that MUST be supported with the
User-based Security Model. Section 7 describes the HMAC-SHA-96
authentication protocol which is another authentication protocol that
SHOULD be supported with the User-based Security Model. In the
future additional or replacement authentication protocols may be
defined as new needs arise.
The User-based Security Model prescribes that, if authentication is
used, then the complete message is checked for integrity in the
authentication module.
For a message to be authenticated, it needs to pass authentication
check by the authentication module and the timeliness check which is
a fixed part of this User-based Security model.
1.4.3. Privacy Protocol
Section 8 describes the CBC-DES Symmetric Encryption Protocol which
is the first privacy protocol to be used with the User-based Security
Model. In the future additional or replacement privacy protocols may
be defined as new needs arise.
The User-based Security Model prescribes that the scopedPDU is
protected from disclosure when a message is sent with privacy.
The User-based Security Model also prescribes that a message needs to
be authenticated if privacy is in use.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1.5. Protection against Message Replay, Delay and Redirection
1.5.1. Authoritative SNMP Engine
In order to protect against message replay, delay and redirection,
one of the SNMP engines involved in each communication is designated
to be the authoritative SNMP engine. When an SNMP message contains a
payload which expects a response (those messages that contain a
Confirmed Class PDU [RFC3411]), then the receiver of such messages is
authoritative. When an SNMP message contains a payload which does
not expect a response (those messages that contain an Unconfirmed
Class PDU [RFC3411]), then the sender of such a message is
authoritative.
1.5.2. Mechanisms
The following mechanisms are used:
1) To protect against the threat of message delay or replay (to an
extent greater than can occur through normal operation), a set of
timeliness indicators (for the authoritative SNMP engine) are
included in each message generated. An SNMP engine evaluates the
timeliness indicators to determine if a received message is
recent. An SNMP engine may evaluate the timeliness indicators to
ensure that a received message is at least as recent as the last
message it received from the same source. A non-authoritative
SNMP engine uses received authentic messages to advance its notion
of the timeliness indicators at the remote authoritative source.
An SNMP engine MUST also use a mechanism to match incoming
Responses to outstanding Requests and it MUST drop any Responses
that do not match an outstanding request. For example, a msgID
can be inserted in every message to cater for this functionality.
These mechanisms provide for the detection of authenticated
messages whose time of generation was not recent.
This protection against the threat of message delay or replay does
not imply nor provide any protection against unauthorized deletion
or suppression of messages. Also, an SNMP engine may not be able
to detect message reordering if all the messages involved are sent
within the Time Window interval. Other mechanisms defined
independently of the security protocol can also be used to detect
the re-ordering replay, deletion, or suppression of messages
containing Set operations (e.g., the MIB variable snmpSetSerialNo
[RFC3418]).
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
2) Verification that a message sent to/from one authoritative SNMP
engine cannot be replayed to/as-if-from another authoritative SNMP
engine.
Included in each message is an identifier unique to the
authoritative SNMP engine associated with the sender or intended
recipient of the message.
A message containing an Unconfirmed Class PDU sent by an
authoritative SNMP engine to one non-authoritative SNMP engine can
potentially be replayed to another non-authoritative SNMP engine.
The latter non-authoritative SNMP engine might (if it knows about
the same userName with the same secrets at the authoritative SNMP
engine) as a result update its notion of timeliness indicators of
the authoritative SNMP engine, but that is not considered a
threat. In this case, A Report or Response message will be
discarded by the Message Processing Model, because there should
not be an outstanding Request message. A Trap will possibly be
accepted. Again, that is not considered a threat, because the
communication was authenticated and timely. It is as if the
authoritative SNMP engine was configured to start sending Traps to
the second SNMP engine, which theoretically can happen without the
knowledge of the second SNMP engine anyway. Anyway, the second
SNMP engine may not expect to receive this Trap, but is allowed to
see the management information contained in it.
3) Detection of messages which were not recently generated.
A set of time indicators are included in the message, indicating
the time of generation. Messages without recent time indicators
are not considered authentic. In addition, an SNMP engine MUST
drop any Responses that do not match an outstanding request. This
however is the responsibility of the Message Processing Model.
This memo allows the same user to be defined on multiple SNMP
engines. Each SNMP engine maintains a value, snmpEngineID, which
uniquely identifies the SNMP engine. This value is included in each
message sent to/from the SNMP engine that is authoritative (see
section 1.5.1). On receipt of a message, an authoritative SNMP
engine checks the value to ensure that it is the intended recipient,
and a non-authoritative SNMP engine uses the value to ensure that the
message is processed using the correct state information.
Each SNMP engine maintains two values, snmpEngineBoots and
snmpEngineTime, which taken together provide an indication of time at
that SNMP engine. Both of these values are included in an
authenticated message sent to/received from that SNMP engine. On
receipt, the values are checked to ensure that the indicated
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
timeliness value is within a Time Window of the current time. The
Time Window represents an administrative upper bound on acceptable
delivery delay for protocol messages.
For an SNMP engine to generate a message which an authoritative SNMP
engine will accept as authentic, and to verify that a message
received from that authoritative SNMP engine is authentic, such an
SNMP engine must first achieve timeliness synchronization with the
authoritative SNMP engine. See section 2.3.
1.6. Abstract Service Interfaces
Abstract service interfaces have been defined to describe the
conceptual interfaces between the various subsystems within an SNMP
entity. Similarly a set of abstract service interfaces have been
defined within the User-based Security Model (USM) to describe the
conceptual interfaces between the generic USM services and the
self-contained authentication and privacy services.
These abstract service interfaces are defined by a set of primitives
that define the services provided and the abstract data elements that
must be passed when the services are invoked. This section lists the
primitives that have been defined for the User-based Security Model.
1.6.1. User-based Security Model Primitives for Authentication
The User-based Security Model provides the following internal
primitives to pass data back and forth between the Security Model
itself and the authentication service:
statusInformation =
authenticateOutgoingMsg(
IN authKey -- secret key for authentication
IN wholeMsg -- unauthenticated complete message
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- complete authenticated message
)
statusInformation =
authenticateIncomingMsg(
IN authKey -- secret key for authentication
IN authParameters -- as received on the wire
IN wholeMsg -- as received on the wire
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- complete authenticated message
)
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1.6.2. User-based Security Model Primitives for Privacy
The User-based Security Model provides the following internal
primitives to pass data back and forth between the Security Model
itself and the privacy service:
statusInformation =
encryptData(
IN encryptKey -- secret key for encryption
IN dataToEncrypt -- data to encrypt (scopedPDU)
OUT encryptedData -- encrypted data (encryptedPDU)
OUT privParameters -- filled in by service provider
)
statusInformation =
decryptData(
IN decryptKey -- secret key for decrypting
IN privParameters -- as received on the wire
IN encryptedData -- encrypted data (encryptedPDU)
OUT decryptedData -- decrypted data (scopedPDU)
)
2. Elements of the Model
This section contains definitions required to realize the security
model defined by this memo.
2.1. User-based Security Model Users
Management operations using this Security Model make use of a defined
set of user identities. For any user on whose behalf management
operations are authorized at a particular SNMP engine, that SNMP
engine must have knowledge of that user. An SNMP engine that wishes
to communicate with another SNMP engine must also have knowledge of a
user known to that engine, including knowledge of the applicable
attributes of that user.
A user and its attributes are defined as follows:
userName
A string representing the name of the user.
securityName
A human-readable string representing the user in a format that is
Security Model independent. There is a one-to-one relationship
between userName and securityName.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
authProtocol
An indication of whether messages sent on behalf of this user can
be authenticated, and if so, the type of authentication protocol
which is used. Two such protocols are defined in this memo:
- the HMAC-MD5-96 authentication protocol.
- the HMAC-SHA-96 authentication protocol.
authKey
If messages sent on behalf of this user can be authenticated, the
(private) authentication key for use with the authentication
protocol. Note that a user's authentication key will normally be
different at different authoritative SNMP engines. The authKey is
not accessible via SNMP. The length requirements of the authKey
are defined by the authProtocol in use.
authKeyChange and authOwnKeyChange
The only way to remotely update the authentication key. Does that
in a secure manner, so that the update can be completed without
the need to employ privacy protection.
privProtocol
An indication of whether messages sent on behalf of this user can
be protected from disclosure, and if so, the type of privacy
protocol which is used. One such protocol is defined in this
memo: the CBC-DES Symmetric Encryption Protocol.
privKey
If messages sent on behalf of this user can be en/decrypted, the
(private) privacy key for use with the privacy protocol. Note
that a user's privacy key will normally be different at different
authoritative SNMP engines. The privKey is not accessible via
SNMP. The length requirements of the privKey are defined by the
privProtocol in use.
privKeyChange and privOwnKeyChange
The only way to remotely update the encryption key. Does that in
a secure manner, so that the update can be completed without the
need to employ privacy protection.
2.2. Replay Protection
Each SNMP engine maintains three objects:
- snmpEngineID, which (at least within an administrative domain)
uniquely and unambiguously identifies an SNMP engine.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- snmpEngineBoots, which is a count of the number of times the SNMP
engine has re-booted/re-initialized since snmpEngineID was last
configured; and,
- snmpEngineTime, which is the number of seconds since the
snmpEngineBoots counter was last incremented.
Each SNMP engine is always authoritative with respect to these
objects in its own SNMP entity. It is the responsibility of a non-
authoritative SNMP engine to synchronize with the authoritative SNMP
engine, as appropriate.
An authoritative SNMP engine is required to maintain the values of
its snmpEngineID and snmpEngineBoots in non-volatile storage.
2.2.1. msgAuthoritativeEngineID
The msgAuthoritativeEngineID value contained in an authenticated
message is used to defeat attacks in which messages from one SNMP
engine to another SNMP engine are replayed to a different SNMP
engine. It represents the snmpEngineID at the authoritative SNMP
engine involved in the exchange of the message.
When an authoritative SNMP engine is first installed, it sets its
local value of snmpEngineID according to a enterprise-specific
algorithm (see the definition of the Textual Convention for
SnmpEngineID in the SNMP Architecture document [RFC3411]).
2.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots and msgAuthoritativeEngineTime
The msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots and msgAuthoritativeEngineTime values
contained in an authenticated message are used to defeat attacks in
which messages are replayed when they are no longer valid. They
represent the snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime values at the
authoritative SNMP engine involved in the exchange of the message.
Through use of snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime, there is no
requirement for an SNMP engine to have a non-volatile clock which
ticks (i.e., increases with the passage of time) even when the
SNMP engine is powered off. Rather, each time an SNMP engine
re-boots, it retrieves, increments, and then stores snmpEngineBoots
in non-volatile storage, and resets snmpEngineTime to zero.
When an SNMP engine is first installed, it sets its local values of
snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime to zero. If snmpEngineTime ever
reaches its maximum value (2147483647), then snmpEngineBoots is
incremented as if the SNMP engine has re-booted and snmpEngineTime is
reset to zero and starts incrementing again.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Each time an authoritative SNMP engine re-boots, any SNMP engines
holding that authoritative SNMP engine's values of snmpEngineBoots
and snmpEngineTime need to re-synchronize prior to sending correctly
authenticated messages to that authoritative SNMP engine (see Section
2.3 for (re-)synchronization procedures). Note, however, that the
procedures do provide for a notification to be accepted as authentic
by a receiving SNMP engine, when sent by an authoritative SNMP engine
which has re-booted since the receiving SNMP engine last (re-
)synchronized.
If an authoritative SNMP engine is ever unable to determine its
latest snmpEngineBoots value, then it must set its snmpEngineBoots
value to 2147483647.
Whenever the local value of snmpEngineBoots has the value 2147483647
it latches at that value and an authenticated message always causes
an notInTimeWindow authentication failure.
In order to reset an SNMP engine whose snmpEngineBoots value has
reached the value 2147483647, manual intervention is required. The
engine must be physically visited and re-configured, either with a
new snmpEngineID value, or with new secret values for the
authentication and privacy protocols of all users known to that SNMP
engine. Note that even if an SNMP engine re-boots once a second that
it would still take approximately 68 years before the max value of
2147483647 would be reached.
2.2.3. Time Window
The Time Window is a value that specifies the window of time in which
a message generated on behalf of any user is valid. This memo
specifies that the same value of the Time Window, 150 seconds, is
used for all users.
2.3. Time Synchronization
Time synchronization, required by a non-authoritative SNMP engine
in order to proceed with authentic communications, has occurred
when the non-authoritative SNMP engine has obtained a local notion
of the authoritative SNMP engine's values of snmpEngineBoots and
snmpEngineTime from the authoritative SNMP engine. These values
must be (and remain) within the authoritative SNMP engine's Time
Window. So the local notion of the authoritative SNMP engine's
values must be kept loosely synchronized with the values stored
at the authoritative SNMP engine. In addition to keeping a local
copy of snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime from the authoritative
SNMP engine, a non-authoritative SNMP engine must also keep one
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
local variable, latestReceivedEngineTime. This value records the
highest value of snmpEngineTime that was received by the
non-authoritative SNMP engine from the authoritative SNMP engine
and is used to eliminate the possibility of replaying messages
that would prevent the non-authoritative SNMP engine's notion of
the snmpEngineTime from advancing.
A non-authoritative SNMP engine must keep local notions of these
values (snmpEngineBoots, snmpEngineTime and latestReceivedEngineTime)
for each authoritative SNMP engine with which it wishes to
communicate. Since each authoritative SNMP engine is uniquely and
unambiguously identified by its value of snmpEngineID, the
non-authoritative SNMP engine may use this value as a key in order to
cache its local notions of these values.
Time synchronization occurs as part of the procedures of receiving an
SNMP message (Section 3.2, step 7b). As such, no explicit time
synchronization procedure is required by a non-authoritative SNMP
engine. Note, that whenever the local value of snmpEngineID is
changed (e.g., through discovery) or when secure communications are
first established with an authoritative SNMP engine, the local values
of snmpEngineBoots and latestReceivedEngineTime should be set to
zero. This will cause the time synchronization to occur when the
next authentic message is received.
2.4. SNMP Messages Using this Security Model
The syntax of an SNMP message using this Security Model adheres to
the message format defined in the version-specific Message Processing
Model document (for example [RFC3412]).
The field msgSecurityParameters in SNMPv3 messages has a data type of
OCTET STRING. Its value is the BER serialization of the following
ASN.1 sequence:
USMSecurityParametersSyntax DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN
UsmSecurityParameters ::=
SEQUENCE {
-- global User-based security parameters
msgAuthoritativeEngineID OCTET STRING,
msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots INTEGER (0..2147483647),
msgAuthoritativeEngineTime INTEGER (0..2147483647),
msgUserName OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..32)),
-- authentication protocol specific parameters
msgAuthenticationParameters OCTET STRING,
-- privacy protocol specific parameters
msgPrivacyParameters OCTET STRING
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
}
END
The fields of this sequence are:
- The msgAuthoritativeEngineID specifies the snmpEngineID of the
authoritative SNMP engine involved in the exchange of the message.
- The msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots specifies the snmpEngineBoots value
at the authoritative SNMP engine involved in the exchange of the
message.
- The msgAuthoritativeEngineTime specifies the snmpEngineTime value
at the authoritative SNMP engine involved in the exchange of the
message.
- The msgUserName specifies the user (principal) on whose behalf the
message is being exchanged. Note that a zero-length userName will
not match any user, but it can be used for snmpEngineID discovery.
- The msgAuthenticationParameters are defined by the authentication
protocol in use for the message, as defined by the
usmUserAuthProtocol column in the user's entry in the usmUserTable.
- The msgPrivacyParameters are defined by the privacy protocol in use
for the message, as defined by the usmUserPrivProtocol column in
the user's entry in the usmUserTable).
See appendix A.4 for an example of the BER encoding of field
msgSecurityParameters.
2.5. Services provided by the User-based Security Model
This section describes the services provided by the User-based
Security Model with their inputs and outputs.
The services are described as primitives of an abstract service
interface and the inputs and outputs are described as abstract data
elements as they are passed in these abstract service primitives.
2.5.1. Services for Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message
When the Message Processing (MP) Subsystem invokes the User-based
Security module to secure an outgoing SNMP message, it must use the
appropriate service as provided by the Security module. These two
services are provided:
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1) A service to generate a Request message. The abstract service
primitive is:
statusInformation = -- success or errorIndication
generateRequestMsg(
IN messageProcessingModel -- typically, SNMP version
IN globalData -- message header, admin data
IN maxMessageSize -- of the sending SNMP entity
IN securityModel -- for the outgoing message
IN securityEngineID -- authoritative SNMP entity
IN securityName -- on behalf of this principal
IN securityLevel -- Level of Security requested
IN scopedPDU -- message (plaintext) payload
OUT securityParameters -- filled in by Security Module
OUT wholeMsg -- complete generated message
OUT wholeMsgLength -- length of generated message
)
2) A service to generate a Response message. The abstract service
primitive is:
statusInformation = -- success or errorIndication
generateResponseMsg(
IN messageProcessingModel -- typically, SNMP version
IN globalData -- message header, admin data
IN maxMessageSize -- of the sending SNMP entity
IN securityModel -- for the outgoing message
IN securityEngineID -- authoritative SNMP entity
IN securityName -- on behalf of this principal
IN securityLevel -- Level of Security requested
IN scopedPDU -- message (plaintext) payload
IN securityStateReference -- reference to security state
-- information from original
-- request
OUT securityParameters -- filled in by Security Module
OUT wholeMsg -- complete generated message
OUT wholeMsgLength -- length of generated message
)
The abstract data elements passed as parameters in the abstract
service primitives are as follows:
statusInformation
An indication of whether the encoding and securing of the message
was successful. If not it is an indication of the problem.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
messageProcessingModel
The SNMP version number for the message to be generated. This
data is not used by the User-based Security module.
globalData
The message header (i.e., its administrative information). This
data is not used by the User-based Security module.
maxMessageSize
The maximum message size as included in the message. This data is
not used by the User-based Security module.
securityParameters
These are the security parameters. They will be filled in by the
User-based Security module.
securityModel
The securityModel in use. Should be User-based Security Model.
This data is not used by the User-based Security module.
securityName
Together with the snmpEngineID it identifies a row in the
usmUserTablethat is to be used for securing the message. The
securityName has a format that is independent of the Security
Model. In case of a response this parameter is ignored and the
value from the cache is used.
securityLevel
The Level of Security from which the User-based Security module
determines if the message needs to be protected from disclosure
and if the message needs to be authenticated.
securityEngineID
The snmpEngineID of the authoritative SNMP engine to which a
dateRequest message is to be sent. In case of a response it is
implied to be the processing SNMP engine's snmpEngineID and so if
it is specified, then it is ignored.
scopedPDU
The message payload. The data is opaque as far as the User-based
Security Model is concerned.
securityStateReference
A handle/reference to cachedSecurityData to be used when securing
an outgoing Response message. This is the exact same
handle/reference as it was generated by the User-based Security
module when processing the incoming Request message to which this
is the Response message.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
wholeMsg
The fully encoded and secured message ready for sending on the
wire.
wholeMsgLength
The length of the encoded and secured message (wholeMsg).
Upon completion of the process, the User-based Security module
returns statusInformation. If the process was successful, the
completed message with privacy and authentication applied if such was
requested by the specified securityLevel is returned. If the process
was not successful, then an errorIndication is returned.
2.5.2. Services for Processing an Incoming SNMP Message
When the Message Processing (MP) Subsystem invokes the User-based
Security module to verify proper security of an incoming message, it
must use the service provided for an incoming message. The abstract
service primitive is:
statusInformation = -- errorIndication or success
-- error counter OID/value if error
processIncomingMsg(
IN messageProcessingModel -- typically, SNMP version
IN maxMessageSize -- of the sending SNMP entity
IN securityParameters -- for the received message
IN securityModel -- for the received message
IN securityLevel -- Level of Security
IN wholeMsg -- as received on the wire
IN wholeMsgLength -- length as received on the wire
OUT securityEngineID -- authoritative SNMP entity
OUT securityName -- identification of the principal
OUT scopedPDU, -- message (plaintext) payload
OUT maxSizeResponseScopedPDU -- maximum size of the Response PDU
OUT securityStateReference -- reference to security state
) -- information, needed for response
The abstract data elements passed as parameters in the abstract
service primitives are as follows:
statusInformation
An indication of whether the process was successful or not. If
not, then the statusInformation includes the OID and the value of
the error counter that was incremented.
messageProcessingModel
The SNMP version number as received in the message. This data is
not used by the User-based Security module.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
maxMessageSize
The maximum message size as included in the message. The User-bas
User-based Security module uses this value to calculate the
maxSizeResponseScopedPDU.
securityParameters
These are the security parameters as received in the message.
securityModel
The securityModel in use. Should be the User-based Security
Model. This data is not used by the User-based Security module.
securityLevel
The Level of Security from which the User-based Security module
determines if the message needs to be protected from disclosure
and if the message needs to be authenticated.
wholeMsg
The whole message as it was received.
wholeMsgLength
The length of the message as it was received (wholeMsg).
securityEngineID
The snmpEngineID that was extracted from the field
msgAuthoritativeEngineID and that was used to lookup the secrets
in the usmUserTable.
securityName
The security name representing the user on whose behalf the
message was received. The securityName has a format that is
independent of the Security Model.
scopedPDU
The message payload. The data is opaque as far as the User-based
Security Model is concerned.
maxSizeResponseScopedPDU
The maximum size of a scopedPDU to be included in a possible
Response message. The User-based Security module calculates this
size based on the msgMaxSize (as received in the message) and the
space required for the message header (including the
securityParameters) for such a Response message.
securityStateReference
A handle/reference to cachedSecurityData to be used when securing
an outgoing Response message. When the Message Processing
Subsystem calls the User-based Security module to generate a
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
response to this incoming message it must pass this
handle/reference.
Upon completion of the process, the User-based Security module
returns statusInformation and, if the process was successful, the
additional data elements for further processing of the message. If
the process was not successful, then an errorIndication, possibly
with a OID and value pair of an error counter that was incremented.
2.6. Key Localization Algorithm.
A localized key is a secret key shared between a user U and one
authoritative SNMP engine E. Even though a user may have only one
password and therefore one key for the whole network, the actual
secrets shared between the user and each authoritative SNMP engine
will be different. This is achieved by key localization [Localized-
key].
First, if a user uses a password, then the user's password is
converted into a key Ku using one of the two algorithms described in
Appendices A.2.1 and A.2.2.
To convert key Ku into a localized key Kul of user U at the
authoritative SNMP engine E, one appends the snmpEngineID of the
authoritative SNMP engine to the key Ku and then appends the key Ku
to the result, thus enveloping the snmpEngineID within the two copies
of user's key Ku. Then one runs a secure hash function (which one
depends on the authentication protocol defined for this user U at
authoritative SNMP engine E; this document defines two authentication
protocols with their associated algorithms based on MD5 and SHA).
The output of the hash-function is the localized key Kul for user U
at the authoritative SNMP engine E.
3. Elements of Procedure
This section describes the security related procedures followed by an
SNMP engine when processing SNMP messages according to the User-based
Security Model.
3.1. Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it generates a message containing a management operation
(like a request, a response, a notification, or a report) on behalf
of a user, with a particular securityLevel.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1) a) If any securityStateReference is passed (Response or Report
message), then information concerning the user is extracted
from the cachedSecurityData. The cachedSecurityData can now be
discarded. The securityEngineID is set to the local
snmpEngineID. The securityLevel is set to the value specified
by the calling module.
Otherwise,
b) based on the securityName, information concerning the user at
the destination snmpEngineID, specified by the
securityEngineID, is extracted from the Local Configuration
Datastore (LCD, usmUserTable). If information about the user
is absent from the LCD, then an error indication
(unknownSecurityName) is returned to the calling module.
2) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is to be protected
from disclosure, but the user does not support both an
authentication and a privacy protocol then the message cannot be
sent. An error indication (unsupportedSecurityLevel) is returned
to the calling module.
3) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is to be
authenticated, but the user does not support an authentication
protocol, then the message cannot be sent. An error indication
(unsupportedSecurityLevel) is returned to the calling module.
4) a) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is to be
protected from disclosure, then the octet sequence representing
the serialized scopedPDU is encrypted according to the user's
privacy protocol. To do so a call is made to the privacy
module that implements the user's privacy protocol according to
the abstract primitive:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
encryptData(
IN encryptKey -- user's localized privKey
IN dataToEncrypt -- serialized scopedPDU
OUT encryptedData -- serialized encryptedPDU
OUT privParameters -- serialized privacy parameters
)
statusInformation
indicates if the encryption process was successful or not.
encryptKey
the user's localized private privKey is the secret key that
can be used by the encryption algorithm.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
dataToEncrypt
the serialized scopedPDU is the data to be encrypted.
encryptedData
the encryptedPDU represents the encrypted scopedPDU, encoded
as an OCTET STRING.
privParameters
the privacy parameters, encoded as an OCTET STRING.
If the privacy module returns failure, then the message cannot
be sent and an error indication (encryptionError) is returned
to the calling module.
If the privacy module returns success, then the returned
privParameters are put into the msgPrivacyParameters field of
the securityParameters and the encryptedPDU serves as the
payload of the message being prepared.
Otherwise,
b) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is not to be be
protected from disclosure, then a zero-length OCTET STRING is
encoded into the msgPrivacyParameters field of the
securityParameters and the plaintext scopedPDU serves as the
payload of the message being prepared.
5) The securityEngineID is encoded as an OCTET STRING into the
msgAuthoritativeEngineID field of the securityParameters. Note
that an empty (zero length) securityEngineID is OK for a Request
message, because that will cause the remote (authoritative) SNMP
engine to return a Report PDU with the proper securityEngineID
included in the msgAuthoritativeEngineID in the securityParameters
of that returned Report PDU.
6) a) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is to be
authenticated, then the current values of snmpEngineBoots and
snmpEngineTime corresponding to the securityEngineID from the
LCD are used.
Otherwise,
b) If this is a Response or Report message, then the current value
of snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime corresponding to the
local snmpEngineID from the LCD are used.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Otherwise,
c) If this is a Request message, then a zero value is used for
both snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime. This zero value gets
used if snmpEngineID is empty.
The values are encoded as INTEGER respectively into the
msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots and msgAuthoritativeEngineTime
fields of the securityParameters.
7) The userName is encoded as an OCTET STRING into the msgUserName
field of the securityParameters.
8) a) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is to be
authenticated, the message is authenticated according to the
user's authentication protocol. To do so a call is made to the
authentication module that implements the user's authentication
protocol according to the abstract service primitive:
statusInformation =
authenticateOutgoingMsg(
IN authKey -- the user's localized authKey
IN wholeMsg -- unauthenticated message
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- authenticated complete message
)
statusInformation
indicates if authentication was successful or not.
authKey
the user's localized private authKey is the secret key that
can be used by the authentication algorithm.
wholeMsg
the complete serialized message to be authenticated.
authenticatedWholeMsg
the same as the input given to the authenticateOutgoingMsg
service, but with msgAuthenticationParameters properly
filled in.
If the authentication module returns failure, then the message
cannot be sent and an error indication (authenticationFailure)
is returned to the calling module.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
If the authentication module returns success, then the
msgAuthenticationParameters field is put into the
securityParameters and the authenticatedWholeMsg represents the
serialization of the authenticated message being prepared.
Otherwise,
b) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is not to be
authenticated then a zero-length OCTET STRING is encoded into
the msgAuthenticationParameters field of the
securityParameters. The wholeMsg is now serialized and then
represents the unauthenticated message being prepared.
9) The completed message with its length is returned to the calling
module with the statusInformation set to success.
3.2. Processing an Incoming SNMP Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it receives a message containing a management operation on
behalf of a user, with a particular securityLevel.
To simplify the elements of procedure, the release of state
information is not always explicitly specified. As a general rule,
if state information is available when a message gets discarded, the
state information should also be released. Also, an error indication
can return an OID and value for an incremented counter and optionally
a value for securityLevel, and values for contextEngineID or
contextName for the counter. In addition, the securityStateReference
data is returned if any such information is available at the point
where the error is detected.
1) If the received securityParameters is not the serialization
(according to the conventions of [RFC3417]) of an OCTET STRING
formatted according to the UsmSecurityParameters defined in
section 2.4, then the snmpInASNParseErrs counter [RFC3418] is
incremented, and an error indication (parseError) is returned to
the calling module. Note that we return without the OID and
value of the incremented counter, because in this case there is
not enough information to generate a Report PDU.
2) The values of the security parameter fields are extracted from
the securityParameters. The securityEngineID to be returned to
the caller is the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineID field.
The cachedSecurityData is prepared and a securityStateReference
is prepared to reference this data. Values to be cached are:
msgUserName
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
3) If the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineID field in the
securityParameters is unknown then:
a) a non-authoritative SNMP engine that performs discovery may
optionally create a new entry in its Local Configuration
Datastore (LCD) and continue processing;
or
b) the usmStatsUnknownEngineIDs counter is incremented, and an
error indication (unknownEngineID) together with the OID and
value of the incremented counter is returned to the calling
module.
Note in the event that a zero-length, or other illegally sized
msgAuthoritativeEngineID is received, b) should be chosen to
facilitate engineID discovery. Otherwise the choice between a)
and b) is an implementation issue.
4) Information about the value of the msgUserName and
msgAuthoritativeEngineID fields is extracted from the Local
Configuration Datastore (LCD, usmUserTable). If no information
is available for the user, then the usmStatsUnknownUserNames
counter is incremented and an error indication
(unknownSecurityName) together with the OID and value of the
incremented counter is returned to the calling module.
5) If the information about the user indicates that it does not
support the securityLevel requested by the caller, then the
usmStatsUnsupportedSecLevels counter is incremented and an error
indication (unsupportedSecurityLevel) together with the OID and
value of the incremented counter is returned to the calling
module.
6) If the securityLevel specifies that the message is to be
authenticated, then the message is authenticated according to the
user's authentication protocol. To do so a call is made to the
authentication module that implements the user's authentication
protocol according to the abstract service primitive:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
authenticateIncomingMsg(
IN authKey -- the user's localized authKey
IN authParameters -- as received on the wire
IN wholeMsg -- as received on the wire
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- checked for authentication
)
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
statusInformation
indicates if authentication was successful or not.
authKey
the user's localized private authKey is the secret key that
can be used by the authentication algorithm.
wholeMsg
the complete serialized message to be authenticated.
authenticatedWholeMsg
the same as the input given to the authenticateIncomingMsg
service, but after authentication has been checked.
If the authentication module returns failure, then the message
cannot be trusted, so the usmStatsWrongDigests counter is
incremented and an error indication (authenticationFailure)
together with the OID and value of the incremented counter is
returned to the calling module.
If the authentication module returns success, then the message is
authentic and can be trusted so processing continues.
7) If the securityLevel indicates an authenticated message, then the
local values of snmpEngineBoots, snmpEngineTime and
latestReceivedEngineTime corresponding to the value of the
msgAuthoritativeEngineID field are extracted from the Local
Configuration Datastore.
a) If the extracted value of msgAuthoritativeEngineID is the same
as the value of snmpEngineID of the processing SNMP engine
(meaning this is the authoritative SNMP engine), then if any
of the following conditions is true, then the message is
considered to be outside of the Time Window:
- the local value of snmpEngineBoots is 2147483647;
- the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots field differs
from the local value of snmpEngineBoots; or,
- the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineTime field differs
from the local notion of snmpEngineTime by more than +/- 150
seconds.
If the message is considered to be outside of the Time Window
then the usmStatsNotInTimeWindows counter is incremented and
an error indication (notInTimeWindow) together with the OID,
the value of the incremented counter, and an indication that
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
the error must be reported with a securityLevel of authNoPriv,
is returned to the calling module
b) If the extracted value of msgAuthoritativeEngineID is not the
same as the value snmpEngineID of the processing SNMP engine
(meaning this is not the authoritative SNMP engine), then:
1) if at least one of the following conditions is true:
- the extracted value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots
field is greater than the local notion of the value of
snmpEngineBoots; or,
- the extracted value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots
field is equal to the local notion of the value of
snmpEngineBoots, and the extracted value of
msgAuthoritativeEngineTime field is greater than the
value of latestReceivedEngineTime,
then the LCD entry corresponding to the extracted value of
the msgAuthoritativeEngineID field is updated, by setting:
- the local notion of the value of snmpEngineBoots to the
value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots field,
- the local notion of the value of snmpEngineTime to the
value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineTime field, and
- the latestReceivedEngineTime to the value of the value of
the msgAuthoritativeEngineTime field.
2) if any of the following conditions is true, then the
message is considered to be outside of the Time Window:
- the local notion of the value of snmpEngineBoots is
2147483647;
- the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots field is
less than the local notion of the value of
snmpEngineBoots; or,
- the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots field is
equal to the local notion of the value of snmpEngineBoots
and the value of the msgAuthoritativeEngineTime field is
more than 150 seconds less than the local notion of the
value of snmpEngineTime.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
If the message is considered to be outside of the Time
Window then an error indication (notInTimeWindow) is
returned to the calling module.
Note that this means that a too old (possibly replayed)
message has been detected and is deemed unauthentic.
Note that this procedure allows for the value of
msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots in the message to be greater
than the local notion of the value of snmpEngineBoots to
allow for received messages to be accepted as authentic
when received from an authoritative SNMP engine that has
re-booted since the receiving SNMP engine last
(re-)synchronized.
8) a) If the securityLevel indicates that the message was protected
from disclosure, then the OCTET STRING representing the
encryptedPDU is decrypted according to the user's privacy
protocol to obtain an unencrypted serialized scopedPDU value.
To do so a call is made to the privacy module that implements
the user's privacy protocol according to the abstract
primitive:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
decryptData(
IN decryptKey -- the user's localized privKey
IN privParameters -- as received on the wire
IN encryptedData -- encryptedPDU as received
OUT decryptedData -- serialized decrypted scopedPDU
)
statusInformation
indicates if the decryption process was successful or not.
decryptKey
the user's localized private privKey is the secret key that
can be used by the decryption algorithm.
privParameters
the msgPrivacyParameters, encoded as an OCTET STRING.
encryptedData
the encryptedPDU represents the encrypted scopedPDU,
encoded as an OCTET STRING.
decryptedData
the serialized scopedPDU if decryption is successful.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
If the privacy module returns failure, then the message can
not be processed, so the usmStatsDecryptionErrors counter is
incremented and an error indication (decryptionError) together
with the OID and value of the incremented counter is returned
to the calling module.
If the privacy module returns success, then the decrypted
scopedPDU is the message payload to be returned to the calling
module.
Otherwise,
b) The scopedPDU component is assumed to be in plain text and is
the message payload to be returned to the calling module.
9) The maxSizeResponseScopedPDU is calculated. This is the maximum
size allowed for a scopedPDU for a possible Response message.
Provision is made for a message header that allows the same
securityLevel as the received Request.
10) The securityName for the user is retrieved from the usmUserTable.
11) The security data is cached as cachedSecurityData, so that a
possible response to this message can and will use the same
authentication and privacy secrets. Information to be
saved/cached is as follows:
msgUserName,
usmUserAuthProtocol, usmUserAuthKey
usmUserPrivProtocol, usmUserPrivKey
12) The statusInformation is set to success and a return is made to
the calling module passing back the OUT parameters as specified
in the processIncomingMsg primitive.
4. Discovery
The User-based Security Model requires that a discovery process
obtains sufficient information about other SNMP engines in order to
communicate with them. Discovery requires an non-authoritative SNMP
engine to learn the authoritative SNMP engine's snmpEngineID value
before communication may proceed. This may be accomplished by
generating a Request message with a securityLevel of noAuthNoPriv, a
msgUserName of zero-length, a msgAuthoritativeEngineID value of zero
length, and the varBindList left empty. The response to this message
will be a Report message containing the snmpEngineID of the
authoritative SNMP engine as the value of the
msgAuthoritativeEngineID field within the msgSecurityParameters
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
field. It contains a Report PDU with the usmStatsUnknownEngineIDs
counter in the varBindList.
If authenticated communication is required, then the discovery
process should also establish time synchronization with the
authoritative SNMP engine. This may be accomplished by sending an
authenticated Request message with the value of
msgAuthoritativeEngineID set to the newly learned snmpEngineID and
with the values of msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots and
msgAuthoritativeEngineTime set to zero. For an authenticated Request
message, a valid userName must be used in the msgUserName field. The
response to this authenticated message will be a Report message
containing the up to date values of the authoritative SNMP engine's
snmpEngineBoots and snmpEngineTime as the value of the
msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots and msgAuthoritativeEngineTime fields
respectively. It also contains the usmStatsNotInTimeWindows counter
in the varBindList of the Report PDU. The time synchronization then
happens automatically as part of the procedures in section 3.2 step
7b. See also section 2.3.
5. Definitions
SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
OBJECT-IDENTITY,
snmpModules, Counter32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, TestAndIncr,
RowStatus, RowPointer,
StorageType, AutonomousType FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF
SnmpAdminString, SnmpEngineID,
snmpAuthProtocols, snmpPrivProtocols FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB;
snmpUsmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200210160000Z" -- 16 Oct 2002, midnight
ORGANIZATION "SNMPv3 Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO "WG-email: snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com
Subscribe: majordomo@lists.tislabs.com
In msg body: subscribe snmpv3
Chair: Russ Mundy
Network Associates Laboratories
postal: 15204 Omega Drive, Suite 300
Rockville, MD 20850-4601
USA
email: mundy@tislabs.com
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
phone: +1 301-947-7107
Co-Chair: David Harrington
Enterasys Networks
Postal: 35 Industrial Way
P. O. Box 5004
Rochester, New Hampshire 03866-5005
USA
EMail: dbh@enterasys.com
Phone: +1 603-337-2614
Co-editor Uri Blumenthal
Lucent Technologies
postal: 67 Whippany Rd.
Whippany, NJ 07981
USA
email: uri@lucent.com
phone: +1-973-386-2163
Co-editor: Bert Wijnen
Lucent Technologies
postal: Schagen 33
3461 GL Linschoten
Netherlands
email: bwijnen@lucent.com
phone: +31-348-480-685
"
DESCRIPTION "The management information definitions for the
SNMP User-based Security Model.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). This
version of this MIB module is part of RFC 3414;
see the RFC itself for full legal notices.
"
-- Revision history
REVISION "200210160000Z" -- 16 Oct 2002, midnight
DESCRIPTION "Changes in this revision:
- Updated references and contact info.
- Clarification to usmUserCloneFrom DESCRIPTION
clause
- Fixed 'command responder' into 'command generator'
in last para of DESCRIPTION clause of
usmUserTable.
This revision published as RFC3414.
"
REVISION "199901200000Z" -- 20 Jan 1999, midnight
DESCRIPTION "Clarifications, published as RFC2574"
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
REVISION "199711200000Z" -- 20 Nov 1997, midnight
DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published as RFC2274"
::= { snmpModules 15 }
-- Administrative assignments ****************************************
usmMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpUsmMIB 1 }
usmMIBConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpUsmMIB 2 }
-- Identification of Authentication and Privacy Protocols ************
usmNoAuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "No Authentication Protocol."
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 1 }
usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The HMAC-MD5-96 Digest Authentication Protocol."
REFERENCE "- H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R. Canetti HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication,
RFC2104, Feb 1997.
- Rivest, R., Message Digest Algorithm MD5, RFC1321.
"
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 2 }
usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The HMAC-SHA-96 Digest Authentication Protocol."
REFERENCE "- H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R. Canetti, HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication,
RFC2104, Feb 1997.
- Secure Hash Algorithm. NIST FIPS 180-1.
"
::= { snmpAuthProtocols 3 }
usmNoPrivProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "No Privacy Protocol."
::= { snmpPrivProtocols 1 }
usmDESPrivProtocol OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The CBC-DES Symmetric Encryption Protocol."
REFERENCE "- Data Encryption Standard, National Institute of
Standards and Technology. Federal Information
Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 46-1.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Supersedes FIPS Publication 46,
(January, 1977; reaffirmed January, 1988).
- Data Encryption Algorithm, American National
Standards Institute. ANSI X3.92-1981,
(December, 1980).
- DES Modes of Operation, National Institute of
Standards and Technology. Federal Information
Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 81,
(December, 1980).
- Data Encryption Algorithm - Modes of Operation,
American National Standards Institute.
ANSI X3.106-1983, (May 1983).
"
::= { snmpPrivProtocols 2 }
-- Textual Conventions ***********************************************
KeyChange ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Every definition of an object with this syntax must identify
a protocol P, a secret key K, and a hash algorithm H
that produces output of L octets.
The object's value is a manager-generated, partially-random
value which, when modified, causes the value of the secret
key K, to be modified via a one-way function.
The value of an instance of this object is the concatenation
of two components: first a 'random' component and then a
'delta' component.
The lengths of the random and delta components
are given by the corresponding value of the protocol P;
if P requires K to be a fixed length, the length of both the
random and delta components is that fixed length; if P
allows the length of K to be variable up to a particular
maximum length, the length of the random component is that
maximum length and the length of the delta component is any
length less than or equal to that maximum length.
For example, usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol requires K to be a fixed
length of 16 octets and L - of 16 octets.
usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol requires K to be a fixed length of
20 octets and L - of 20 octets. Other protocols may define
other sizes, as deemed appropriate.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
When a requester wants to change the old key K to a new
key keyNew on a remote entity, the 'random' component is
obtained from either a true random generator, or from a
pseudorandom generator, and the 'delta' component is
computed as follows:
- a temporary variable is initialized to the existing value
of K;
- if the length of the keyNew is greater than L octets,
then:
- the random component is appended to the value of the
temporary variable, and the result is input to the
the hash algorithm H to produce a digest value, and
the temporary variable is set to this digest value;
- the value of the temporary variable is XOR-ed with
the first (next) L-octets (16 octets in case of MD5)
of the keyNew to produce the first (next) L-octets
(16 octets in case of MD5) of the 'delta' component.
- the above two steps are repeated until the unused
portion of the keyNew component is L octets or less,
- the random component is appended to the value of the
temporary variable, and the result is input to the
hash algorithm H to produce a digest value;
- this digest value, truncated if necessary to be the same
length as the unused portion of the keyNew, is XOR-ed
with the unused portion of the keyNew to produce the
(final portion of the) 'delta' component.
For example, using MD5 as the hash algorithm H:
iterations = (lenOfDelta - 1)/16; /* integer division */
temp = keyOld;
for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
temp = MD5 (temp || random);
delta[i*16 .. (i*16)+15] =
temp XOR keyNew[i*16 .. (i*16)+15];
}
temp = MD5 (temp || random);
delta[i*16 .. lenOfDelta-1] =
temp XOR keyNew[i*16 .. lenOfDelta-1];
The 'random' and 'delta' components are then concatenated as
described above, and the resulting octet string is sent to
the recipient as the new value of an instance of this object.
At the receiver side, when an instance of this object is set
to a new value, then a new value of K is computed as follows:
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- a temporary variable is initialized to the existing value
of K;
- if the length of the delta component is greater than L
octets, then:
- the random component is appended to the value of the
temporary variable, and the result is input to the
hash algorithm H to produce a digest value, and the
temporary variable is set to this digest value;
- the value of the temporary variable is XOR-ed with
the first (next) L-octets (16 octets in case of MD5)
of the delta component to produce the first (next)
L-octets (16 octets in case of MD5) of the new value
of K.
- the above two steps are repeated until the unused
portion of the delta component is L octets or less,
- the random component is appended to the value of the
temporary variable, and the result is input to the
hash algorithm H to produce a digest value;
- this digest value, truncated if necessary to be the same
length as the unused portion of the delta component, is
XOR-ed with the unused portion of the delta component to
produce the (final portion of the) new value of K.
For example, using MD5 as the hash algorithm H:
iterations = (lenOfDelta - 1)/16; /* integer division */
temp = keyOld;
for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
temp = MD5 (temp || random);
keyNew[i*16 .. (i*16)+15] =
temp XOR delta[i*16 .. (i*16)+15];
}
temp = MD5 (temp || random);
keyNew[i*16 .. lenOfDelta-1] =
temp XOR delta[i*16 .. lenOfDelta-1];
The value of an object with this syntax, whenever it is
retrieved by the management protocol, is always the zero
length string.
Note that the keyOld and keyNew are the localized keys.
Note that it is probably wise that when an SNMP entity sends
a SetRequest to change a key, that it keeps a copy of the old
key until it has confirmed that the key change actually
succeeded.
"
SYNTAX OCTET STRING
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
-- Statistics for the User-based Security Model **********************
usmStats OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { usmMIBObjects 1 }
usmStatsUnsupportedSecLevels OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because they requested a
securityLevel that was unknown to the SNMP engine
or otherwise unavailable.
"
::= { usmStats 1 }
usmStatsNotInTimeWindows OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because they appeared
outside of the authoritative SNMP engine's window.
"
::= { usmStats 2 }
usmStatsUnknownUserNames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because they referenced a
user that was not known to the SNMP engine.
"
::= { usmStats 3 }
usmStatsUnknownEngineIDs OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because they referenced an
snmpEngineID that was not known to the SNMP engine.
"
::= { usmStats 4 }
usmStatsWrongDigests OBJECT-TYPE
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because they didn't
contain the expected digest value.
"
::= { usmStats 5 }
usmStatsDecryptionErrors OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because they could not be
decrypted.
"
::= { usmStats 6 }
-- The usmUser Group ************************************************
usmUser OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { usmMIBObjects 2 }
usmUserSpinLock OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TestAndIncr
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "An advisory lock used to allow several cooperating
Command Generator Applications to coordinate their
use of facilities to alter secrets in the
usmUserTable.
"
::= { usmUser 1 }
-- The table of valid users for the User-based Security Model ********
usmUserTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF UsmUserEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The table of users configured in the SNMP engine's
Local Configuration Datastore (LCD).
To create a new user (i.e., to instantiate a new
conceptual row in this table), it is recommended to
follow this procedure:
1) GET(usmUserSpinLock.0) and save in sValue.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
2) SET(usmUserSpinLock.0=sValue,
usmUserCloneFrom=templateUser,
usmUserStatus=createAndWait)
You should use a template user to clone from
which has the proper auth/priv protocol defined.
If the new user is to use privacy:
3) generate the keyChange value based on the secret
privKey of the clone-from user and the secret key
to be used for the new user. Let us call this
pkcValue.
4) GET(usmUserSpinLock.0) and save in sValue.
5) SET(usmUserSpinLock.0=sValue,
usmUserPrivKeyChange=pkcValue
usmUserPublic=randomValue1)
6) GET(usmUserPulic) and check it has randomValue1.
If not, repeat steps 4-6.
If the new user will never use privacy:
7) SET(usmUserPrivProtocol=usmNoPrivProtocol)
If the new user is to use authentication:
8) generate the keyChange value based on the secret
authKey of the clone-from user and the secret key
to be used for the new user. Let us call this
akcValue.
9) GET(usmUserSpinLock.0) and save in sValue.
10) SET(usmUserSpinLock.0=sValue,
usmUserAuthKeyChange=akcValue
usmUserPublic=randomValue2)
11) GET(usmUserPulic) and check it has randomValue2.
If not, repeat steps 9-11.
If the new user will never use authentication:
12) SET(usmUserAuthProtocol=usmNoAuthProtocol)
Finally, activate the new user:
13) SET(usmUserStatus=active)
The new user should now be available and ready to be
used for SNMPv3 communication. Note however that access
to MIB data must be provided via configuration of the
SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The use of usmUserSpinlock is to avoid conflicts with
another SNMP command generator application which may
also be acting on the usmUserTable.
"
::= { usmUser 2 }
usmUserEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX UsmUserEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "A user configured in the SNMP engine's Local
Configuration Datastore (LCD) for the User-based
Security Model.
"
INDEX { usmUserEngineID,
usmUserName
}
::= { usmUserTable 1 }
UsmUserEntry ::= SEQUENCE
{
usmUserEngineID SnmpEngineID,
usmUserName SnmpAdminString,
usmUserSecurityName SnmpAdminString,
usmUserCloneFrom RowPointer,
usmUserAuthProtocol AutonomousType,
usmUserAuthKeyChange KeyChange,
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange KeyChange,
usmUserPrivProtocol AutonomousType,
usmUserPrivKeyChange KeyChange,
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange KeyChange,
usmUserPublic OCTET STRING,
usmUserStorageType StorageType,
usmUserStatus RowStatus
}
usmUserEngineID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpEngineID
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "An SNMP engine's administratively-unique identifier.
In a simple agent, this value is always that agent's
own snmpEngineID value.
The value can also take the value of the snmpEngineID
of a remote SNMP engine with which this user can
communicate.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
"
::= { usmUserEntry 1 }
usmUserName OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..32))
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "A human readable string representing the name of
the user.
This is the (User-based Security) Model dependent
security ID.
"
::= { usmUserEntry 2 }
usmUserSecurityName OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "A human readable string representing the user in
Security Model independent format.
The default transformation of the User-based Security
Model dependent security ID to the securityName and
vice versa is the identity function so that the
securityName is the same as the userName.
"
::= { usmUserEntry 3 }
usmUserCloneFrom OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "A pointer to another conceptual row in this
usmUserTable. The user in this other conceptual
row is called the clone-from user.
When a new user is created (i.e., a new conceptual
row is instantiated in this table), the privacy and
authentication parameters of the new user must be
cloned from its clone-from user. These parameters are:
- authentication protocol (usmUserAuthProtocol)
- privacy protocol (usmUserPrivProtocol)
They will be copied regardless of what the current
value is.
Cloning also causes the initial values of the secret
authentication key (authKey) and the secret encryption
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
key (privKey) of the new user to be set to the same
values as the corresponding secrets of the clone-from
user to allow the KeyChange process to occur as
required during user creation.
The first time an instance of this object is set by
a management operation (either at or after its
instantiation), the cloning process is invoked.
Subsequent writes are successful but invoke no
action to be taken by the receiver.
The cloning process fails with an 'inconsistentName'
error if the conceptual row representing the
clone-from user does not exist or is not in an active
state when the cloning process is invoked.
When this object is read, the ZeroDotZero OID
is returned.
"
::= { usmUserEntry 4 }
usmUserAuthProtocol OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX AutonomousType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "An indication of whether messages sent on behalf of
this user to/from the SNMP engine identified by
usmUserEngineID, can be authenticated, and if so,
the type of authentication protocol which is used.
An instance of this object is created concurrently
with the creation of any other object instance for
the same user (i.e., as part of the processing of
the set operation which creates the first object
instance in the same conceptual row).
If an initial set operation (i.e. at row creation time)
tries to set a value for an unknown or unsupported
protocol, then a 'wrongValue' error must be returned.
The value will be overwritten/set when a set operation
is performed on the corresponding instance of
usmUserCloneFrom.
Once instantiated, the value of such an instance of
this object can only be changed via a set operation to
the value of the usmNoAuthProtocol.
If a set operation tries to change the value of an
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
existing instance of this object to any value other
than usmNoAuthProtocol, then an 'inconsistentValue'
error must be returned.
If a set operation tries to set the value to the
usmNoAuthProtocol while the usmUserPrivProtocol value
in the same row is not equal to usmNoPrivProtocol,
then an 'inconsistentValue' error must be returned.
That means that an SNMP command generator application
must first ensure that the usmUserPrivProtocol is set
to the usmNoPrivProtocol value before it can set
the usmUserAuthProtocol value to usmNoAuthProtocol.
"
DEFVAL { usmNoAuthProtocol }
::= { usmUserEntry 5 }
usmUserAuthKeyChange OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX KeyChange -- typically (SIZE (0 | 32)) for HMACMD5
-- typically (SIZE (0 | 40)) for HMACSHA
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "An object, which when modified, causes the secret
authentication key used for messages sent on behalf
of this user to/from the SNMP engine identified by
usmUserEngineID, to be modified via a one-way
function.
The associated protocol is the usmUserAuthProtocol.
The associated secret key is the user's secret
authentication key (authKey). The associated hash
algorithm is the algorithm used by the user's
usmUserAuthProtocol.
When creating a new user, it is an 'inconsistentName'
error for a set operation to refer to this object
unless it is previously or concurrently initialized
through a set operation on the corresponding instance
of usmUserCloneFrom.
When the value of the corresponding usmUserAuthProtocol
is usmNoAuthProtocol, then a set is successful, but
effectively is a no-op.
When this object is read, the zero-length (empty)
string is returned.
The recommended way to do a key change is as follows:
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1) GET(usmUserSpinLock.0) and save in sValue.
2) generate the keyChange value based on the old
(existing) secret key and the new secret key,
let us call this kcValue.
If you do the key change on behalf of another user:
3) SET(usmUserSpinLock.0=sValue,
usmUserAuthKeyChange=kcValue
usmUserPublic=randomValue)
If you do the key change for yourself:
4) SET(usmUserSpinLock.0=sValue,
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange=kcValue
usmUserPublic=randomValue)
If you get a response with error-status of noError,
then the SET succeeded and the new key is active.
If you do not get a response, then you can issue a
GET(usmUserPublic) and check if the value is equal
to the randomValue you did send in the SET. If so, then
the key change succeeded and the new key is active
(probably the response got lost). If not, then the SET
request probably never reached the target and so you
can start over with the procedure above.
"
DEFVAL { ''H } -- the empty string
::= { usmUserEntry 6 }
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX KeyChange -- typically (SIZE (0 | 32)) for HMACMD5
-- typically (SIZE (0 | 40)) for HMACSHA
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Behaves exactly as usmUserAuthKeyChange, with one
notable difference: in order for the set operation
to succeed, the usmUserName of the operation
requester must match the usmUserName that
indexes the row which is targeted by this
operation.
In addition, the USM security model must be
used for this operation.
The idea here is that access to this column can be
public, since it will only allow a user to change
his own secret authentication key (authKey).
Note that this can only be done once the row is active.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
When a set is received and the usmUserName of the
requester is not the same as the umsUserName that
indexes the row which is targeted by this operation,
then a 'noAccess' error must be returned.
When a set is received and the security model in use
is not USM, then a 'noAccess' error must be returned.
"
DEFVAL { ''H } -- the empty string
::= { usmUserEntry 7 }
usmUserPrivProtocol OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX AutonomousType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "An indication of whether messages sent on behalf of
this user to/from the SNMP engine identified by
usmUserEngineID, can be protected from disclosure,
and if so, the type of privacy protocol which is used.
An instance of this object is created concurrently
with the creation of any other object instance for
the same user (i.e., as part of the processing of
the set operation which creates the first object
instance in the same conceptual row).
If an initial set operation (i.e. at row creation time)
tries to set a value for an unknown or unsupported
protocol, then a 'wrongValue' error must be returned.
The value will be overwritten/set when a set operation
is performed on the corresponding instance of
usmUserCloneFrom.
Once instantiated, the value of such an instance of
this object can only be changed via a set operation to
the value of the usmNoPrivProtocol.
If a set operation tries to change the value of an
existing instance of this object to any value other
than usmNoPrivProtocol, then an 'inconsistentValue'
error must be returned.
Note that if any privacy protocol is used, then you
must also use an authentication protocol. In other
words, if usmUserPrivProtocol is set to anything else
than usmNoPrivProtocol, then the corresponding instance
of usmUserAuthProtocol cannot have a value of
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
usmNoAuthProtocol. If it does, then an
'inconsistentValue' error must be returned.
"
DEFVAL { usmNoPrivProtocol }
::= { usmUserEntry 8 }
usmUserPrivKeyChange OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX KeyChange -- typically (SIZE (0 | 32)) for DES
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "An object, which when modified, causes the secret
encryption key used for messages sent on behalf
of this user to/from the SNMP engine identified by
usmUserEngineID, to be modified via a one-way
function.
The associated protocol is the usmUserPrivProtocol.
The associated secret key is the user's secret
privacy key (privKey). The associated hash
algorithm is the algorithm used by the user's
usmUserAuthProtocol.
When creating a new user, it is an 'inconsistentName'
error for a set operation to refer to this object
unless it is previously or concurrently initialized
through a set operation on the corresponding instance
of usmUserCloneFrom.
When the value of the corresponding usmUserPrivProtocol
is usmNoPrivProtocol, then a set is successful, but
effectively is a no-op.
When this object is read, the zero-length (empty)
string is returned.
See the description clause of usmUserAuthKeyChange for
a recommended procedure to do a key change.
"
DEFVAL { ''H } -- the empty string
::= { usmUserEntry 9 }
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX KeyChange -- typically (SIZE (0 | 32)) for DES
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Behaves exactly as usmUserPrivKeyChange, with one
notable difference: in order for the Set operation
to succeed, the usmUserName of the operation
requester must match the usmUserName that indexes
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
the row which is targeted by this operation.
In addition, the USM security model must be
used for this operation.
The idea here is that access to this column can be
public, since it will only allow a user to change
his own secret privacy key (privKey).
Note that this can only be done once the row is active.
When a set is received and the usmUserName of the
requester is not the same as the umsUserName that
indexes the row which is targeted by this operation,
then a 'noAccess' error must be returned.
When a set is received and the security model in use
is not USM, then a 'noAccess' error must be returned.
"
DEFVAL { ''H } -- the empty string
::= { usmUserEntry 10 }
usmUserPublic OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..32))
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "A publicly-readable value which can be written as part
of the procedure for changing a user's secret
authentication and/or privacy key, and later read to
determine whether the change of the secret was
effected.
"
DEFVAL { ''H } -- the empty string
::= { usmUserEntry 11 }
usmUserStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The storage type for this conceptual row.
Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' must
allow write-access at a minimum to:
- usmUserAuthKeyChange, usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange
and usmUserPublic for a user who employs
authentication, and
- usmUserPrivKeyChange, usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange
and usmUserPublic for a user who employs
privacy.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Note that any user who employs authentication or
privacy must allow its secret(s) to be updated and
thus cannot be 'readOnly'.
If an initial set operation tries to set the value to
'readOnly' for a user who employs authentication or
privacy, then an 'inconsistentValue' error must be
returned. Note that if the value has been previously
set (implicit or explicit) to any value, then the rules
as defined in the StorageType Textual Convention apply.
It is an implementation issue to decide if a SET for
a readOnly or permanent row is accepted at all. In some
contexts this may make sense, in others it may not. If
a SET for a readOnly or permanent row is not accepted
at all, then a 'wrongValue' error must be returned.
"
DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { usmUserEntry 12 }
usmUserStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The status of this conceptual row.
Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the
corresponding instance of the usmUserStatus column
is 'notReady'.
In particular, a newly created row for a user who
employs authentication, cannot be made active until the
corresponding usmUserCloneFrom and usmUserAuthKeyChange
have been set.
Further, a newly created row for a user who also
employs privacy, cannot be made active until the
usmUserPrivKeyChange has been set.
The RowStatus TC [RFC2579] requires that this
DESCRIPTION clause states under which circumstances
other objects in this row can be modified:
The value of this object has no effect on whether
other objects in this conceptual row can be modified,
except for usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange and
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange. For these 2 objects, the
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
value of usmUserStatus MUST be active.
"
::= { usmUserEntry 13 }
-- Conformance Information *******************************************
usmMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { usmMIBConformance 1 }
usmMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { usmMIBConformance 2 }
-- Compliance statements
usmMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP engines which
implement the SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB.
"
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { usmMIBBasicGroup }
OBJECT usmUserAuthProtocol
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
OBJECT usmUserPrivProtocol
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
::= { usmMIBCompliances 1 }
-- Units of compliance
usmMIBBasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
usmStatsUnsupportedSecLevels,
usmStatsNotInTimeWindows,
usmStatsUnknownUserNames,
usmStatsUnknownEngineIDs,
usmStatsWrongDigests,
usmStatsDecryptionErrors,
usmUserSpinLock,
usmUserSecurityName,
usmUserCloneFrom,
usmUserAuthProtocol,
usmUserAuthKeyChange,
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange,
usmUserPrivProtocol,
usmUserPrivKeyChange,
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange,
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
usmUserPublic,
usmUserStorageType,
usmUserStatus
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects providing for configuration
of an SNMP engine which implements the SNMP
User-based Security Model.
"
::= { usmMIBGroups 1 }
END
6. HMAC-MD5-96 Authentication Protocol
This section describes the HMAC-MD5-96 authentication protocol. This
authentication protocol is the first defined for the User-based
Security Model. It uses MD5 hash-function which is described in
[RFC1321], in HMAC mode described in [RFC2104], truncating the output
to 96 bits.
This protocol is identified by usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol.
Over time, other authentication protocols may be defined either as a
replacement of this protocol or in addition to this protocol.
6.1. Mechanisms
- In support of data integrity, a message digest algorithm is
required. A digest is calculated over an appropriate portion of an
SNMP message and included as part of the message sent to the
recipient.
- In support of data origin authentication and data integrity, a
secret value is prepended to SNMP message prior to computing the
digest; the calculated digest is partially inserted into the SNMP
message prior to transmission, and the prepended value is not
transmitted. The secret value is shared by all SNMP engines
authorized to originate messages on behalf of the appropriate user.
6.1.1. Digest Authentication Mechanism
The Digest Authentication Mechanism defined in this memo provides
for:
- verification of the integrity of a received message, i.e., the
message received is the message sent.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The integrity of the message is protected by computing a digest
over an appropriate portion of the message. The digest is computed
by the originator of the message, transmitted with the message, and
verified by the recipient of the message.
- verification of the user on whose behalf the message was generated.
A secret value known only to SNMP engines authorized to generate
messages on behalf of a user is used in HMAC mode (see [RFC2104]).
It also recommends the hash-function output used as Message
Authentication Code, to be truncated.
This protocol uses the MD5 [RFC1321] message digest algorithm. A
128-bit MD5 digest is calculated in a special (HMAC) way over the
designated portion of an SNMP message and the first 96 bits of this
digest is included as part of the message sent to the recipient. The
size of the digest carried in a message is 12 octets. The size of
the private authentication key (the secret) is 16 octets. For the
details see section 6.3.
6.2. Elements of the Digest Authentication Protocol
This section contains definitions required to realize the
authentication module defined in this section of this memo.
6.2.1. Users
Authentication using this authentication protocol makes use of a
defined set of userNames. For any user on whose behalf a message
must be authenticated at a particular SNMP engine, that SNMP engine
must have knowledge of that user. An SNMP engine that wishes to
communicate with another SNMP engine must also have knowledge of a
user known to that engine, including knowledge of the applicable
attributes of that user.
A user and its attributes are defined as follows:
<userName>
A string representing the name of the user.
<authKey>
A user's secret key to be used when calculating a digest.
It MUST be 16 octets long for MD5.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
6.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineID
The msgAuthoritativeEngineID value contained in an authenticated
message specifies the authoritative SNMP engine for that particular
message (see the definition of SnmpEngineID in the SNMP Architecture
document [RFC3411]).
The user's (private) authentication key is normally different at each
authoritative SNMP engine and so the snmpEngineID is used to select
the proper key for the authentication process.
6.2.3. SNMP Messages Using this Authentication Protocol
Messages using this authentication protocol carry a
msgAuthenticationParameters field as part of the
msgSecurityParameters. For this protocol, the
msgAuthenticationParameters field is the serialized OCTET STRING
representing the first 12 octets of the HMAC-MD5-96 output done over
the wholeMsg.
The digest is calculated over the wholeMsg so if a message is
authenticated, that also means that all the fields in the message are
intact and have not been tampered with.
6.2.4. Services provided by the HMAC-MD5-96 Authentication Module
This section describes the inputs and outputs that the HMAC-MD5-96
Authentication module expects and produces when the User-based
Security module calls the HMAC-MD5-96 Authentication module for
services.
6.2.4.1. Services for Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message
The HMAC-MD5-96 authentication protocol assumes that the selection of
the authKey is done by the caller and that the caller passes the
secret key to be used.
Upon completion the authentication module returns statusInformation
and, if the message digest was correctly calculated, the wholeMsg
with the digest inserted at the proper place. The abstract service
primitive is:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
authenticateOutgoingMsg(
IN authKey -- secret key for authentication
IN wholeMsg -- unauthenticated complete message
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- complete authenticated message
)
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The abstract data elements are:
statusInformation
An indication of whether the authentication process was successful.
If not it is an indication of the problem.
authKey
The secret key to be used by the authentication algorithm. The
length of this key MUST be 16 octets.
wholeMsg
The message to be authenticated.
authenticatedWholeMsg
The authenticated message (including inserted digest) on output.
Note, that authParameters field is filled by the authentication
module and this module and this field should be already present in
the wholeMsg before the Message Authentication Code (MAC) is
generated.
6.2.4.2. Services for Processing an Incoming SNMP Message
The HMAC-MD5-96 authentication protocol assumes that the selection of
the authKey is done by the caller and that the caller passes the
secret key to be used.
Upon completion the authentication module returns statusInformation
and, if the message digest was correctly calculated, the wholeMsg as
it was processed. The abstract service primitive is:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
authenticateIncomingMsg(
IN authKey -- secret key for authentication
IN authParameters -- as received on the wire
IN wholeMsg -- as received on the wire
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- complete authenticated message
)
The abstract data elements are:
statusInformation
An indication of whether the authentication process was successful.
If not it is an indication of the problem.
authKey
The secret key to be used by the authentication algorithm. The
length of this key MUST be 16 octets.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
authParameters
The authParameters from the incoming message.
wholeMsg
The message to be authenticated on input and the authenticated
message on output.
authenticatedWholeMsg
The whole message after the authentication check is complete.
6.3. Elements of Procedure
This section describes the procedures for the HMAC-MD5-96
authentication protocol.
6.3.1. Processing an Outgoing Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must authenticate an outgoing message using the
usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol.
1) The msgAuthenticationParameters field is set to the serialization,
according to the rules in [RFC3417], of an OCTET STRING containing
12 zero octets.
2) From the secret authKey, two keys K1 and K2 are derived:
a) extend the authKey to 64 octets by appending 48 zero octets;
save it as extendedAuthKey
b) obtain IPAD by replicating the octet 0x36 64 times;
c) obtain K1 by XORing extendedAuthKey with IPAD;
d) obtain OPAD by replicating the octet 0x5C 64 times;
e) obtain K2 by XORing extendedAuthKey with OPAD.
3) Prepend K1 to the wholeMsg and calculate MD5 digest over it
according to [RFC1321].
4) Prepend K2 to the result of the step 4 and calculate MD5 digest
over it according to [RFC1321]. Take the first 12 octets of the
final digest - this is Message Authentication Code (MAC).
5) Replace the msgAuthenticationParameters field with MAC obtained in
the step 4.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
6) The authenticatedWholeMsg is then returned to the caller together
with statusInformation indicating success.
6.3.2. Processing an Incoming Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must authenticate an incoming message using the
usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol.
1) If the digest received in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is
not 12 octets long, then an failure and an errorIndication
(authenticationError) is returned to the calling module.
2) The MAC received in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is
saved.
3) The digest in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced by
the 12 zero octets.
4) From the secret authKey, two keys K1 and K2 are derived:
a) extend the authKey to 64 octets by appending 48 zero octets;
save it as extendedAuthKey
b) obtain IPAD by replicating the octet 0x36 64 times;
c) obtain K1 by XORing extendedAuthKey with IPAD;
d) obtain OPAD by replicating the octet 0x5C 64 times;
e) obtain K2 by XORing extendedAuthKey with OPAD.
5) The MAC is calculated over the wholeMsg:
a) prepend K1 to the wholeMsg and calculate the MD5 digest over
it;
b) prepend K2 to the result of step 5.a and calculate the MD5
digest over it;
c) first 12 octets of the result of step 5.b is the MAC.
The msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced with the MAC
value that was saved in step 2.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
6) Then the newly calculated MAC is compared with the MAC saved in
step 2. If they do not match, then an failure and an
errorIndication (authenticationFailure) is returned to the calling
module.
7) The authenticatedWholeMsg and statusInformation indicating success
are then returned to the caller.
7. HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocol
This section describes the HMAC-SHA-96 authentication protocol. This
protocol uses the SHA hash-function which is described in [SHA-NIST],
in HMAC mode described in [RFC2104], truncating the output to 96
bits.
This protocol is identified by usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol.
Over time, other authentication protocols may be defined either as a
replacement of this protocol or in addition to this protocol.
7.1. Mechanisms
- In support of data integrity, a message digest algorithm is
required. A digest is calculated over an appropriate portion of an
SNMP message and included as part of the message sent to the
recipient.
- In support of data origin authentication and data integrity, a
secret value is prepended to the SNMP message prior to computing
the digest; the calculated digest is then partially inserted into
the message prior to transmission. The prepended secret is not
transmitted. The secret value is shared by all SNMP engines
authorized to originate messages on behalf of the appropriate user.
7.1.1. Digest Authentication Mechanism
The Digest Authentication Mechanism defined in this memo provides
for:
- verification of the integrity of a received message, i.e., the
message received is the message sent.
The integrity of the message is protected by computing a digest
over an appropriate portion of the message. The digest is computed
by the originator of the message, transmitted with the message, and
verified by the recipient of the message.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- verification of the user on whose behalf the message was generated.
A secret value known only to SNMP engines authorized to generate
messages on behalf of a user is used in HMAC mode (see [RFC2104]).
It also recommends the hash-function output used as Message
Authentication Code, to be truncated.
This mechanism uses the SHA [SHA-NIST] message digest algorithm. A
160-bit SHA digest is calculated in a special (HMAC) way over the
designated portion of an SNMP message and the first 96 bits of this
digest is included as part of the message sent to the recipient. The
size of the digest carried in a message is 12 octets. The size of
the private authentication key (the secret) is 20 octets. For the
details see section 7.3.
7.2. Elements of the HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocol
This section contains definitions required to realize the
authentication module defined in this section of this memo.
7.2.1. Users
Authentication using this authentication protocol makes use of a
defined set of userNames. For any user on whose behalf a message
must be authenticated at a particular SNMP engine, that SNMP engine
must have knowledge of that user. An SNMP engine that wishes to
communicate with another SNMP engine must also have knowledge of a
user known to that engine, including knowledge of the applicable
attributes of that user.
A user and its attributes are defined as follows:
<userName>
A string representing the name of the user.
<authKey>
A user's secret key to be used when calculating a digest.
It MUST be 20 octets long for SHA.
7.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineID
The msgAuthoritativeEngineID value contained in an authenticated
message specifies the authoritative SNMP engine for that particular
message (see the definition of SnmpEngineID in the SNMP Architecture
document [RFC3411]).
The user's (private) authentication key is normally different at each
authoritative SNMP engine and so the snmpEngineID is used to select
the proper key for the authentication process.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
7.2.3. SNMP Messages Using this Authentication Protocol
Messages using this authentication protocol carry a
msgAuthenticationParameters field as part of the
msgSecurityParameters. For this protocol, the
msgAuthenticationParameters field is the serialized OCTET STRING
representing the first 12 octets of HMAC-SHA-96 output done over the
wholeMsg.
The digest is calculated over the wholeMsg so if a message is
authenticated, that also means that all the fields in the message are
intact and have not been tampered with.
7.2.4. Services Provided by the HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Module
This section describes the inputs and outputs that the HMAC-SHA-96
Authentication module expects and produces when the User-based
Security module calls the HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication module for
services.
7.2.4.1. Services for Generating an Outgoing SNMP Message
HMAC-SHA-96 authentication protocol assumes that the selection of the
authKey is done by the caller and that the caller passes the secret
key to be used.
Upon completion the authentication module returns statusInformation
and, if the message digest was correctly calculated, the wholeMsg
with the digest inserted at the proper place. The abstract service
primitive is:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
authenticateOutgoingMsg(
IN authKey -- secret key for authentication
IN wholeMsg -- unauthenticated complete message
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- complete authenticated message
)
The abstract data elements are:
statusInformation
An indication of whether the authentication process was successful.
If not it is an indication of the problem.
authKey
The secret key to be used by the authentication algorithm. The
length of this key MUST be 20 octets.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
wholeMsg
The message to be authenticated.
authenticatedWholeMsg
The authenticated message (including inserted digest) on output.
Note, that authParameters field is filled by the authentication
module and this field should be already present in the wholeMsg
before the Message Authentication Code (MAC) is generated.
7.2.4.2. Services for Processing an Incoming SNMP Message
HMAC-SHA-96 authentication protocol assumes that the selection of the
authKey is done by the caller and that the caller passes the secret
key to be used.
Upon completion the authentication module returns statusInformation
and, if the message digest was correctly calculated, the wholeMsg as
it was processed. The abstract service primitive is:
statusInformation = -- success or failure
authenticateIncomingMsg(
IN authKey -- secret key for authentication
IN authParameters -- as received on the wire
IN wholeMsg -- as received on the wire
OUT authenticatedWholeMsg -- complete authenticated message
)
The abstract data elements are:
statusInformation
An indication of whether the authentication process was successful.
If not it is an indication of the problem.
authKey
The secret key to be used by the authentication algorithm. The
length of this key MUST be 20 octets.
authParameters
The authParameters from the incoming message.
wholeMsg
The message to be authenticated on input and the authenticated
message on output.
authenticatedWholeMsg
The whole message after the authentication check is complete.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
7.3. Elements of Procedure
This section describes the procedures for the HMAC-SHA-96
authentication protocol.
7.3.1. Processing an Outgoing Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must authenticate an outgoing message using the
usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol.
1) The msgAuthenticationParameters field is set to the serialization,
according to the rules in [RFC3417], of an OCTET STRING containing
12 zero octets.
2) From the secret authKey, two keys K1 and K2 are derived:
a) extend the authKey to 64 octets by appending 44 zero octets;
save it as extendedAuthKey
b) obtain IPAD by replicating the octet 0x36 64 times;
c) obtain K1 by XORing extendedAuthKey with IPAD;
d) obtain OPAD by replicating the octet 0x5C 64 times;
e) obtain K2 by XORing extendedAuthKey with OPAD.
3) Prepend K1 to the wholeMsg and calculate the SHA digest over it
according to [SHA-NIST].
4) Prepend K2 to the result of the step 4 and calculate SHA digest
over it according to [SHA-NIST]. Take the first 12 octets of the
final digest - this is Message Authentication Code (MAC).
5) Replace the msgAuthenticationParameters field with MAC obtained in
the step 5.
6) The authenticatedWholeMsg is then returned to the caller together
with statusInformation indicating success.
7.3.2. Processing an Incoming Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must authenticate an incoming message using the
usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
1) If the digest received in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is
not 12 octets long, then an failure and an errorIndication
(authenticationError) is returned to the calling module.
2) The MAC received in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is
saved.
3) The digest in the msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced by
the 12 zero octets.
4) From the secret authKey, two keys K1 and K2 are derived:
a) extend the authKey to 64 octets by appending 44 zero octets;
save it as extendedAuthKey
b) obtain IPAD by replicating the octet 0x36 64 times;
c) obtain K1 by XORing extendedAuthKey with IPAD;
d) obtain OPAD by replicating the octet 0x5C 64 times;
e) obtain K2 by XORing extendedAuthKey with OPAD.
5) The MAC is calculated over the wholeMsg:
a) prepend K1 to the wholeMsg and calculate the SHA digest over
it;
b) prepend K2 to the result of step 5.a and calculate the SHA
digest over it;
c) first 12 octets of the result of step 5.b is the MAC.
The msgAuthenticationParameters field is replaced with the MAC
value that was saved in step 2.
6) The the newly calculated MAC is compared with the MAC saved in
step 2. If they do not match, then a failure and an
errorIndication (authenticationFailure) are returned to the
calling module.
7) The authenticatedWholeMsg and statusInformation indicating success
are then returned to the caller.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
8. CBC-DES Symmetric Encryption Protocol
This section describes the CBC-DES Symmetric Encryption Protocol.
This protocol is the first privacy protocol defined for the
User-based Security Model.
This protocol is identified by usmDESPrivProtocol.
Over time, other privacy protocols may be defined either as a
replacement of this protocol or in addition to this protocol.
8.1. Mechanisms
- In support of data confidentiality, an encryption algorithm is
required. An appropriate portion of the message is encrypted prior
to being transmitted. The User-based Security Model specifies that
the scopedPDU is the portion of the message that needs to be
encrypted.
- A secret value in combination with a timeliness value is used to
create the en/decryption key and the initialization vector. The
secret value is shared by all SNMP engines authorized to originate
messages on behalf of the appropriate user.
8.1.1. Symmetric Encryption Protocol
The Symmetric Encryption Protocol defined in this memo provides
support for data confidentiality. The designated portion of an SNMP
message is encrypted and included as part of the message sent to the
recipient.
Two organizations have published specifications defining the DES:
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [DES-NIST]
and the American National Standards Institute [DES-ANSI]. There is a
companion Modes of Operation specification for each definition
([DESO-NIST] and [DESO-ANSI], respectively).
The NIST has published three additional documents that implementors
may find useful.
- There is a document with guidelines for implementing and using the
DES, including functional specifications for the DES and its modes
of operation [DESG-NIST].
- There is a specification of a validation test suite for the DES
[DEST-NIST]. The suite is designed to test all aspects of the DES
and is useful for pinpointing specific problems.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- There is a specification of a maintenance test for the DES [DESM-
NIST]. The test utilizes a minimal amount of data and processing
to test all components of the DES. It provides a simple yes-or-no
indication of correct operation and is useful to run as part of an
initialization step, e.g., when a computer re-boots.
8.1.1.1. DES key and Initialization Vector
The first 8 octets of the 16-octet secret (private privacy key) are
used as a DES key. Since DES uses only 56 bits, the Least
Significant Bit in each octet is disregarded.
The Initialization Vector for encryption is obtained using the
following procedure.
The last 8 octets of the 16-octet secret (private privacy key) are
used as pre-IV.
In order to ensure that the IV for two different packets encrypted by
the same key, are not the same (i.e., the IV does not repeat) we need
to "salt" the pre-IV with something unique per packet. An 8-octet
string is used as the "salt". The concatenation of the generating
SNMP engine's 32-bit snmpEngineBoots and a local 32-bit integer, that
the encryption engine maintains, is input to the "salt". The 32-bit
integer is initialized to an arbitrary value at boot time.
The 32-bit snmpEngineBoots is converted to the first 4 octets (Most
Significant Byte first) of our "salt". The 32-bit integer is then
converted to the last 4 octet (Most Significant Byte first) of our
"salt". The resulting "salt" is then XOR-ed with the pre-IV to
obtain the IV. The 8-octet "salt" is then put into the
privParameters field encoded as an OCTET STRING. The "salt" integer
is then modified. We recommend that it be incremented by one and
wrap when it reaches the maximum value.
How exactly the value of the "salt" (and thus of the IV) varies, is
an implementation issue, as long as the measures are taken to avoid
producing a duplicate IV.
The "salt" must be placed in the privParameters field to enable the
receiving entity to compute the correct IV and to decrypt the
message.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
8.1.1.2. Data Encryption
The data to be encrypted is treated as sequence of octets. Its
length should be an integral multiple of 8 - and if it is not, the
data is padded at the end as necessary. The actual pad value is
irrelevant.
The data is encrypted in Cipher Block Chaining mode.
The plaintext is divided into 64-bit blocks.
The plaintext for each block is XOR-ed with the ciphertext of the
previous block, the result is encrypted and the output of the
encryption is the ciphertext for the block. This procedure is
repeated until there are no more plaintext blocks.
For the very first block, the Initialization Vector is used instead
of the ciphertext of the previous block.
8.1.1.3. Data Decryption
Before decryption, the encrypted data length is verified. If the
length of the OCTET STRING to be decrypted is not an integral
multiple of 8 octets, the decryption process is halted and an
appropriate exception noted. When decrypting, the padding is
ignored.
The first ciphertext block is decrypted, the decryption output is
XOR-ed with the Initialization Vector, and the result is the first
plaintext block.
For each subsequent block, the ciphertext block is decrypted, the
decryption output is XOR-ed with the previous ciphertext block and
the result is the plaintext block.
8.2. Elements of the DES Privacy Protocol
This section contains definitions required to realize the privacy
module defined by this memo.
8.2.1. Users
Data en/decryption using this Symmetric Encryption Protocol makes use
of a defined set of userNames. For any user on whose behalf a
message must be en/decrypted at a particular SNMP engine, that SNMP
engine must have knowledge of that user. An SNMP engine that wishes
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 65]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
to communicate with another SNMP engine must also have knowledge of a
user known to that SNMP engine, including knowledge of the applicable
attributes of that user.
A user and its attributes are defined as follows:
<userName>
An octet string representing the name of the user.
<privKey>
A user's secret key to be used as input for the DES key and IV.
The length of this key MUST be 16 octets.
8.2.2. msgAuthoritativeEngineID
The msgAuthoritativeEngineID value contained in an authenticated
message specifies the authoritative SNMP engine for that particular
message (see the definition of SnmpEngineID in the SNMP Architecture
document [RFC3411]).
The user's (private) privacy key is normally different at each
authoritative SNMP engine and so the snmpEngineID is used to select
the proper key for the en/decryption process.
8.2.3. SNMP Messages Using this Privacy Protocol
Messages using this privacy protocol carry a msgPrivacyParameters
field as part of the msgSecurityParameters. For this protocol, the
msgPrivacyParameters field is the serialized OCTET STRING
representing the "salt" that was used to create the IV.
8.2.4. Services Provided by the DES Privacy Module
This section describes the inputs and outputs that the DES Privacy
module expects and produces when the User-based Security module
invokes the DES Privacy module for services.
8.2.4.1. Services for Encrypting Outgoing Data
This DES privacy protocol assumes that the selection of the privKey
is done by the caller and that the caller passes the secret key to be
used.
Upon completion the privacy module returns statusInformation and, if
the encryption process was successful, the encryptedPDU and the
msgPrivacyParameters encoded as an OCTET STRING. The abstract
service primitive is:
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 66]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
statusInformation = -- success of failure
encryptData(
IN encryptKey -- secret key for encryption
IN dataToEncrypt -- data to encrypt (scopedPDU)
OUT encryptedData -- encrypted data (encryptedPDU)
OUT privParameters -- filled in by service provider
)
The abstract data elements are:
statusInformation
An indication of the success or failure of the encryption process.
In case of failure, it is an indication of the error.
encryptKey
The secret key to be used by the encryption algorithm. The length
of this key MUST be 16 octets.
dataToEncrypt
The data that must be encrypted.
encryptedData
The encrypted data upon successful completion.
privParameters
The privParameters encoded as an OCTET STRING.
8.2.4.2. Services for Decrypting Incoming Data
This DES privacy protocol assumes that the selection of the privKey
is done by the caller and that the caller passes the secret key to be
used.
Upon completion the privacy module returns statusInformation and, if
the decryption process was successful, the scopedPDU in plain text.
The abstract service primitive is:
statusInformation =
decryptData(
IN decryptKey -- secret key for decryption
IN privParameters -- as received on the wire
IN encryptedData -- encrypted data (encryptedPDU)
OUT decryptedData -- decrypted data (scopedPDU)
)
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 67]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The abstract data elements are:
statusInformation
An indication whether the data was successfully decrypted and if
not an indication of the error.
decryptKey
The secret key to be used by the decryption algorithm. The length
of this key MUST be 16 octets.
privParameters
The "salt" to be used to calculate the IV.
encryptedData
The data to be decrypted.
decryptedData
The decrypted data.
8.3. Elements of Procedure.
This section describes the procedures for the DES privacy protocol.
8.3.1. Processing an Outgoing Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must encrypt part of an outgoing message using the
usmDESPrivProtocol.
1) The secret cryptKey is used to construct the DES encryption key,
the "salt" and the DES pre-IV (from which the IV is computed as
described in section 8.1.1.1).
2) The privParameters field is set to the serialization according to
the rules in [RFC3417] of an OCTET STRING representing the "salt"
string.
3) The scopedPDU is encrypted (as described in section 8.1.1.2)
and the encrypted data is serialized according to the rules in
[RFC3417] as an OCTET STRING.
4) The serialized OCTET STRING representing the encrypted scopedPDU
together with the privParameters and statusInformation indicating
success is returned to the calling module.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 68]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
8.3.2. Processing an Incoming Message
This section describes the procedure followed by an SNMP engine
whenever it must decrypt part of an incoming message using the
usmDESPrivProtocol.
1) If the privParameters field is not an 8-octet OCTET STRING, then
an error indication (decryptionError) is returned to the calling
module.
2) The "salt" is extracted from the privParameters field.
3) The secret cryptKey and the "salt" are then used to construct the
DES decryption key and pre-IV (from which the IV is computed as
described in section 8.1.1.1).
4) The encryptedPDU is then decrypted (as described in section
8.1.1.3).
5) If the encryptedPDU cannot be decrypted, then an error indication
(decryptionError) is returned to the calling module.
6) The decrypted scopedPDU and statusInformation indicating success
are returned to the calling module.
9. Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 69]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
10. Acknowledgements
This document is the result of the efforts of the SNMPv3 Working
Group. Some special thanks are in order to the following SNMPv3 WG
members:
Harald Tveit Alvestrand (Maxware)
Dave Battle (SNMP Research, Inc.)
Alan Beard (Disney Worldwide Services)
Paul Berrevoets (SWI Systemware/Halcyon Inc.)
Martin Bjorklund (Ericsson)
Uri Blumenthal (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center)
Jeff Case (SNMP Research, Inc.)
John Curran (BBN)
Mike Daniele (Compaq Computer Corporation))
T. Max Devlin (Eltrax Systems)
John Flick (Hewlett Packard)
Rob Frye (MCI)
Wes Hardaker (U.C.Davis, Information Technology - D.C.A.S.)
David Harrington (Cabletron Systems Inc.)
Lauren Heintz (BMC Software, Inc.)
N.C. Hien (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center)
Michael Kirkham (InterWorking Labs, Inc.)
Dave Levi (SNMP Research, Inc.)
Louis A Mamakos (UUNET Technologies Inc.)
Joe Marzot (Nortel Networks)
Paul Meyer (Secure Computing Corporation)
Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems)
Bob Moore (IBM)
Russ Mundy (TIS Labs at Network Associates)
Bob Natale (ACE*COMM Corporation)
Mike O'Dell (UUNET Technologies Inc.)
Dave Perkins (DeskTalk)
Peter Polkinghorne (Brunel University)
Randy Presuhn (BMC Software, Inc.)
David Reeder (TIS Labs at Network Associates)
David Reid (SNMP Research, Inc.)
Aleksey Romanov (Quality Quorum)
Shawn Routhier (Epilogue)
Juergen Schoenwaelder (TU Braunschweig)
Bob Stewart (Cisco Systems)
Mike Thatcher (Independent Consultant)
Bert Wijnen (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center)
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 70]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The document is based on recommendations of the IETF Security and
Administrative Framework Evolution for SNMP Advisory Team. Members
of that Advisory Team were:
David Harrington (Cabletron Systems Inc.)
Jeff Johnson (Cisco Systems)
David Levi (SNMP Research Inc.)
John Linn (Openvision)
Russ Mundy (Trusted Information Systems) chair
Shawn Routhier (Epilogue)
Glenn Waters (Nortel)
Bert Wijnen (IBM T. J. Watson Research Center)
As recommended by the Advisory Team and the SNMPv3 Working Group
Charter, the design incorporates as much as practical from previous
RFCs and drafts. As a result, special thanks are due to the authors
of previous designs known as SNMPv2u and SNMPv2*:
Jeff Case (SNMP Research, Inc.)
David Harrington (Cabletron Systems Inc.)
David Levi (SNMP Research, Inc.)
Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems)
Brian O'Keefe (Hewlett Packard)
Marshall T. Rose (Dover Beach Consulting)
Jon Saperia (BGS Systems Inc.)
Steve Waldbusser (International Network Services)
Glenn W. Waters (Bell-Northern Research Ltd.)
11. Security Considerations
11.1. Recommended Practices
This section describes practices that contribute to the secure,
effective operation of the mechanisms defined in this memo.
- An SNMP engine must discard SNMP Response messages that do not
correspond to any currently outstanding Request message. It is the
responsibility of the Message Processing module to take care of
this. For example it can use a msgID for that.
An SNMP Command Generator Application must discard any Response
Class PDU for which there is no currently outstanding Confirmed
Class PDU; for example for SNMPv2 [RFC3416] PDUs, the request-id
component in the PDU can be used to correlate Responses to
outstanding Requests.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 71]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Although it would be typical for an SNMP engine and an SNMP Command
Generator Application to do this as a matter of course, when using
these security protocols it is significant due to the possibility
of message duplication (malicious or otherwise).
- If an SNMP engine uses a msgID for correlating Response messages to
outstanding Request messages, then it MUST use different msgIDs in
all such Request messages that it sends out during a Time Window
(150 seconds) period.
A Command Generator or Notification Originator Application MUST use
different request-ids in all Request PDUs that it sends out during
a TimeWindow (150 seconds) period.
This must be done to protect against the possibility of message
duplication (malicious or otherwise).
For example, starting operations with a msgID and/or request-id
value of zero is not a good idea. Initializing them with an
unpredictable number (so they do not start out the same after each
reboot) and then incrementing by one would be acceptable.
- An SNMP engine should perform time synchronization using
authenticated messages in order to protect against the possibility
of message duplication (malicious or otherwise).
- When sending state altering messages to a managed authoritative
SNMP engine, a Command Generator Application should delay sending
successive messages to that managed SNMP engine until a positive
acknowledgement is received for the previous message or until the
previous message expires.
No message ordering is imposed by the SNMP. Messages may be
received in any order relative to their time of generation and each
will be processed in the ordered received. Note that when an
authenticated message is sent to a managed SNMP engine, it will be
valid for a period of time of approximately 150 seconds under
normal circumstances, and is subject to replay during this period.
Indeed, an SNMP engine and SNMP Command Generator Applications must
cope with the loss and re-ordering of messages resulting from
anomalies in the network as a matter of course.
However, a managed object, snmpSetSerialNo [RFC3418], is
specifically defined for use with SNMP Set operations in order to
provide a mechanism to ensure that the processing of SNMP messages
occurs in a specific order.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 72]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- The frequency with which the secrets of a User-based Security Model
user should be changed is indirectly related to the frequency of
their use.
Protecting the secrets from disclosure is critical to the overall
security of the protocols. Frequent use of a secret provides a
continued source of data that may be useful to a cryptanalyst in
exploiting known or perceived weaknesses in an algorithm. Frequent
changes to the secret avoid this vulnerability.
Changing a secret after each use is generally regarded as the most
secure practice, but a significant amount of overhead may be
associated with that approach.
Note, too, in a local environment the threat of disclosure may be
less significant, and as such the changing of secrets may be less
frequent. However, when public data networks are used as the
communication paths, more caution is prudent.
11.2 Defining Users
The mechanisms defined in this document employ the notion of users on
whose behalf messages are sent. How "users" are defined is subject
to the security policy of the network administration. For example,
users could be individuals (e.g., "joe" or "jane"), or a particular
role (e.g., "operator" or "administrator"), or a combination (e.g.,
"joe-operator", "jane-operator" or "joe-admin"). Furthermore, a user
may be a logical entity, such as an SNMP Application or a set of SNMP
Applications, acting on behalf of an individual or role, or set of
individuals, or set of roles, including combinations.
Appendix A describes an algorithm for mapping a user "password" to a
16/20 octet value for use as either a user's authentication key or
privacy key (or both). Note however, that using the same password
(and therefore the same key) for both authentication and privacy is
very poor security practice and should be strongly discouraged.
Passwords are often generated, remembered, and input by a human.
Human-generated passwords may be less than the 16/20 octets required
by the authentication and privacy protocols, and brute force attacks
can be quite easy on a relatively short ASCII character set.
Therefore, the algorithm is Appendix A performs a transformation on
the password. If the Appendix A algorithm is used, SNMP
implementations (and SNMP configuration applications) must ensure
that passwords are at least 8 characters in length. Please note that
longer passwords with repetitive strings may result in exactly the
same key. For example, a password 'bertbert' will result in exactly
the same key as password 'bertbertbert'.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 73]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Because the Appendix A algorithm uses such passwords (nearly)
directly, it is very important that they not be easily guessed. It
is suggested that they be composed of mixed-case alphanumeric and
punctuation characters that don't form words or phrases that might be
found in a dictionary. Longer passwords improve the security of the
system. Users may wish to input multiword phrases to make their
password string longer while ensuring that it is memorable.
Since it is infeasible for human users to maintain different
passwords for every SNMP engine, but security requirements strongly
discourage having the same key for more than one SNMP engine, the
User-based Security Model employs a compromise proposed in
[Localized-key]. It derives the user keys for the SNMP engines from
user's password in such a way that it is practically impossible to
either determine the user's password, or user's key for another SNMP
engine from any combination of user's keys on SNMP engines.
Note however, that if user's password is disclosed, then key
localization will not help and network security may be compromised in
this case. Therefore a user's password or non-localized key MUST NOT
be stored on a managed device/node. Instead the localized key SHALL
be stored (if at all), so that, in case a device does get
compromised, no other managed or managing devices get compromised.
11.3. Conformance
To be termed a "Secure SNMP implementation" based on the User-based
Security Model, an SNMP implementation MUST:
- implement one or more Authentication Protocol(s). The HMAC-MD5-96
and HMAC-SHA-96 Authentication Protocols defined in this memo are
examples of such protocols.
- to the maximum extent possible, prohibit access to the secret(s) of
each user about which it maintains information in a Local
Configuration Datastore (LCD) under all circumstances except as
required to generate and/or validate SNMP messages with respect to
that user.
- implement the key-localization mechanism.
- implement the SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB.
In addition, an authoritative SNMP engine SHOULD provide initial
configuration in accordance with Appendix A.1.
Implementation of a Privacy Protocol (the DES Symmetric Encryption
Protocol defined in this memo is one such protocol) is optional.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 74]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
11.4. Use of Reports
The use of unsecure reports (i.e., sending them with a securityLevel
of noAuthNoPriv) potentially exposes a non-authoritative SNMP engine
to some form of attacks. Some people consider these denial of
service attacks, others don't. An installation should evaluate the
risk involved before deploying unsecure Report PDUs.
11.5 Access to the SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB
The objects in this MIB may be considered sensitive in many
environments. Specifically the objects in the usmUserTable contain
information about users and their authentication and privacy
protocols. It is important to closely control (both read and write)
access to these MIB objects by using appropriately configured Access
Control models (for example the View-based Access Control Model as
specified in [RFC3415]).
12. References
12.1 Normative References
[RFC1321] Rivest, R., "Message Digest Algorithm MD5", RFC 1321,
April 1992.
[RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M. and R. Canetti, "HMAC:
Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104,
February 1997.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case,
J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of
Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,
RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case,
J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions
for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case,
J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance
Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 75]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
[RFC3411] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An
Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC
3411, December 2002.
[RFC3412] Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen,
"Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC
3412, December 2002.
[RFC3415] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-
based Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC
3415, December 2002.
[RFC3416] Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and
S. Waldbusser, "Version 2 of the Protocol Operations
for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
STD 62, RFC 3416, December 2002.
[RFC3417] Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and
S. Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC
3417, December 2002.
[RFC3418] Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and
S. Waldbusser, "Management Information Base (MIB) for
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD
62, RFC 3418, December 2002.
[DES-NIST] Data Encryption Standard, National Institute of
Standards and Technology. Federal Information
Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 46-1.
Supersedes FIPS Publication 46, (January, 1977;
reaffirmed January, 1988).
[DESO-NIST] DES Modes of Operation, National Institute of
Standards and Technology. Federal Information
Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 81, (December,
1980).
[SHA-NIST] Secure Hash Algorithm. NIST FIPS 180-1, (April, 1995)
http://csrc.nist.gov/fips/fip180-1.txt (ASCII)
http://csrc.nist.gov/fips/fip180-1.ps (Postscript)
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 76]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
12.1 Informative References
[Localized-Key] U. Blumenthal, N. C. Hien, B. Wijnen "Key Derivation
for Network Management Applications" IEEE Network
Magazine, April/May issue, 1997.
[DES-ANSI] Data Encryption Algorithm, American National
Standards Institute. ANSI X3.92-1981, (December,
1980).
[DESO-ANSI] Data Encryption Algorithm - Modes of Operation,
American National Standards Institute. ANSI X3.106-
1983, (May 1983).
[DESG-NIST] Guidelines for Implementing and Using the NBS Data
Encryption Standard, National Institute of Standards
and Technology. Federal Information Processing
Standard (FIPS) Publication 74, (April, 1981).
[DEST-NIST] Validating the Correctness of Hardware
Implementations of the NBS Data Encryption Standard,
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Special Publication 500-20.
[DESM-NIST] Maintenance Testing for the Data Encryption Standard,
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Special Publication 500-61, (August, 1980).
[RFC3174] Eastlake, D. 3rd and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash
Algorithm 1 (SHA1)", RFC 3174, September 2001.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 77]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
APPENDIX A - Installation
A.1. SNMP engine Installation Parameters
During installation, an authoritative SNMP engine SHOULD (in the
meaning as defined in [RFC2119]) be configured with several initial
parameters. These include:
1) A Security Posture
The choice of security posture determines if initial configuration
is implemented and if so how. One of three possible choices is
selected:
minimum-secure,
semi-secure,
very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration)
In the case of a very-secure posture, there is no initial
configuration, and so the following steps are irrelevant.
2) One or More Secrets
These are the authentication/privacy secrets for the first user to
be configured.
One way to accomplish this is to have the installer enter a
"password" for each required secret. The password is then
algorithmically converted into the required secret by:
- forming a string of length 1,048,576 octets by repeating the
value of the password as often as necessary, truncating
accordingly, and using the resulting string as the input to the
MD5 algorithm [RFC1321]. The resulting digest, termed
"digest1", is used in the next step.
- a second string is formed by concatenating digest1, the SNMP
engine's snmpEngineID value, and digest1. This string is used
as input to the MD5 algorithm [RFC1321].
The resulting digest is the required secret (see Appendix A.2).
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 78]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
With these configured parameters, the SNMP engine instantiates the
following usmUserEntry in the usmUserTable:
no privacy support privacy support
------------------ ---------------
usmUserEngineID localEngineID localEngineID
usmUserName "initial" "initial"
usmUserSecurityName "initial" "initial"
usmUserCloneFrom ZeroDotZero ZeroDotZero
usmUserAuthProtocol usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol
usmUserAuthKeyChange "" ""
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange "" ""
usmUserPrivProtocol none usmDESPrivProtocol
usmUserPrivKeyChange "" ""
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange "" ""
usmUserPublic "" ""
usmUserStorageType anyValidStorageType anyValidStorageType
usmUserStatus active active
It is recommended to also instantiate a set of template
usmUserEntries which can be used as clone-from users for newly
created usmUserEntries. These are the two suggested entries:
no privacy support privacy support
------------------ ---------------
usmUserEngineID localEngineID localEngineID
usmUserName "templateMD5" "templateMD5"
usmUserSecurityName "templateMD5" "templateMD5"
usmUserCloneFrom ZeroDotZero ZeroDotZero
usmUserAuthProtocol usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol
usmUserAuthKeyChange "" ""
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange "" ""
usmUserPrivProtocol none usmDESPrivProtocol
usmUserPrivKeyChange "" ""
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange "" ""
usmUserPublic "" ""
usmUserStorageType permanent permanent
usmUserStatus active active
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 79]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
no privacy support privacy support
------------------ ---------------
usmUserEngineID localEngineID localEngineID
usmUserName "templateSHA" "templateSHA"
usmUserSecurityName "templateSHA" "templateSHA"
usmUserCloneFrom ZeroDotZero ZeroDotZero
usmUserAuthProtocol usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol usmHMACSHAAuthProtocol
usmUserAuthKeyChange "" ""
usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange "" ""
usmUserPrivProtocol none usmDESPrivProtocol
usmUserPrivKeyChange "" ""
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange "" ""
usmUserPublic "" ""
usmUserStorageType permanent permanent
usmUserStatus active active
A.2. Password to Key Algorithm
A sample code fragment (section A.2.1) demonstrates the password to
key algorithm which can be used when mapping a password to an
authentication or privacy key using MD5. The reference source code
of MD5 is available in [RFC1321].
Another sample code fragment (section A.2.2) demonstrates the
password to key algorithm which can be used when mapping a password
to an authentication or privacy key using SHA (documented in SHA-
NIST).
An example of the results of a correct implementation is provided
(section A.3) which an implementor can use to check if his
implementation produces the same result.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 80]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
A.2.1. Password to Key Sample Code for MD5
void password_to_key_md5(
u_char *password, /* IN */
u_int passwordlen, /* IN */
u_char *engineID, /* IN - pointer to snmpEngineID */
u_int engineLength,/* IN - length of snmpEngineID */
u_char *key) /* OUT - pointer to caller 16-octet buffer */
{
MD5_CTX MD;
u_char *cp, password_buf[64];
u_long password_index = 0;
u_long count = 0, i;
MD5Init (&MD); /* initialize MD5 */
/**********************************************/
/* Use while loop until we've done 1 Megabyte */
/**********************************************/
while (count < 1048576) {
cp = password_buf;
for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
/*************************************************/
/* Take the next octet of the password, wrapping */
/* to the beginning of the password as necessary.*/
/*************************************************/
*cp++ = password[password_index++ % passwordlen];
}
MD5Update (&MD, password_buf, 64);
count += 64;
}
MD5Final (key, &MD); /* tell MD5 we're done */
/*****************************************************/
/* Now localize the key with the engineID and pass */
/* through MD5 to produce final key */
/* May want to ensure that engineLength <= 32, */
/* otherwise need to use a buffer larger than 64 */
/*****************************************************/
memcpy(password_buf, key, 16);
memcpy(password_buf+16, engineID, engineLength);
memcpy(password_buf+16+engineLength, key, 16);
MD5Init(&MD);
MD5Update(&MD, password_buf, 32+engineLength);
MD5Final(key, &MD);
return;
}
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 81]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
A.2.2. Password to Key Sample Code for SHA
void password_to_key_sha(
u_char *password, /* IN */
u_int passwordlen, /* IN */
u_char *engineID, /* IN - pointer to snmpEngineID */
u_int engineLength,/* IN - length of snmpEngineID */
u_char *key) /* OUT - pointer to caller 20-octet buffer */
{
SHA_CTX SH;
u_char *cp, password_buf[72];
u_long password_index = 0;
u_long count = 0, i;
SHAInit (&SH); /* initialize SHA */
/**********************************************/
/* Use while loop until we've done 1 Megabyte */
/**********************************************/
while (count < 1048576) {
cp = password_buf;
for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
/*************************************************/
/* Take the next octet of the password, wrapping */
/* to the beginning of the password as necessary.*/
/*************************************************/
*cp++ = password[password_index++ % passwordlen];
}
SHAUpdate (&SH, password_buf, 64);
count += 64;
}
SHAFinal (key, &SH); /* tell SHA we're done */
/*****************************************************/
/* Now localize the key with the engineID and pass */
/* through SHA to produce final key */
/* May want to ensure that engineLength <= 32, */
/* otherwise need to use a buffer larger than 72 */
/*****************************************************/
memcpy(password_buf, key, 20);
memcpy(password_buf+20, engineID, engineLength);
memcpy(password_buf+20+engineLength, key, 20);
SHAInit(&SH);
SHAUpdate(&SH, password_buf, 40+engineLength);
SHAFinal(key, &SH);
return;
}
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 82]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
A.3. Password to Key Sample Results
A.3.1. Password to Key Sample Results using MD5
The following shows a sample output of the password to key algorithm
for a 16-octet key using MD5.
With a password of "maplesyrup" the output of the password to key
algorithm before the key is localized with the SNMP engine's
snmpEngineID is:
'9f af 32 83 88 4e 92 83 4e bc 98 47 d8 ed d9 63'H
After the intermediate key (shown above) is localized with the
snmpEngineID value of:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02'H
the final output of the password to key algorithm is:
'52 6f 5e ed 9f cc e2 6f 89 64 c2 93 07 87 d8 2b'H
A.3.2. Password to Key Sample Results using SHA
The following shows a sample output of the password to key algorithm
for a 20-octet key using SHA.
With a password of "maplesyrup" the output of the password to key
algorithm before the key is localized with the SNMP engine's
snmpEngineID is:
'9f b5 cc 03 81 49 7b 37 93 52 89 39 ff 78 8d 5d 79 14 52 11'H
After the intermediate key (shown above) is localized with the
snmpEngineID value of:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02'H
the final output of the password to key algorithm is:
'66 95 fe bc 92 88 e3 62 82 23 5f c7 15 1f 12 84 97 b3 8f 3f'H
A.4. Sample Encoding of msgSecurityParameters
The msgSecurityParameters in an SNMP message are represented as an
OCTET STRING. This OCTET STRING should be considered opaque outside
a specific Security Model.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 83]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
The User-based Security Model defines the contents of the OCTET
STRING as a SEQUENCE (see section 2.4).
Given these two properties, the following is an example of they
msgSecurityParameters for the User-based Security Model, encoded as
an OCTET STRING:
04 <length>
30 <length>
04 <length> <msgAuthoritativeEngineID>
02 <length> <msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots>
02 <length> <msgAuthoritativeEngineTime>
04 <length> <msgUserName>
04 0c <HMAC-MD5-96-digest>
04 08 <salt>
Here is the example once more, but now with real values (except for
the digest in msgAuthenticationParameters and the salt in
msgPrivacyParameters, which depend on variable data that we have not
defined here):
Hex Data Description
-------------- -----------------------------------------------
04 39 OCTET STRING, length 57
30 37 SEQUENCE, length 55
04 0c 80000002 msgAuthoritativeEngineID: IBM
01 IPv4 address
09840301 9.132.3.1
02 01 01 msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots: 1
02 02 0101 msgAuthoritativeEngineTime: 257
04 04 62657274 msgUserName: bert
04 0c 01234567 msgAuthenticationParameters: sample value
89abcdef
fedcba98
04 08 01234567 msgPrivacyParameters: sample value
89abcdef
A.5. Sample keyChange Results
A.5.1. Sample keyChange Results using MD5
Let us assume that a user has a current password of "maplesyrup" as
in section A.3.1. and let us also assume the snmpEngineID of 12
octets:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02'H
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 84]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
If we now want to change the password to "newsyrup", then we first
calculate the key for the new password. It is as follows:
'01 ad d2 73 10 7c 4e 59 6b 4b 00 f8 2b 1d 42 a7'H
If we localize it for the above snmpEngineID, then the localized new
key becomes:
'87 02 1d 7b d9 d1 01 ba 05 ea 6e 3b f9 d9 bd 4a'H
If we then use a (not so good, but easy to test) random value of:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00'H
Then the value we must send for keyChange is:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
88 05 61 51 41 67 6c c9 19 61 74 e7 42 a3 25 51'H
If this were for the privacy key, then it would be exactly the same.
A.5.2. Sample keyChange Results using SHA
Let us assume that a user has a current password of "maplesyrup" as
in section A.3.2. and let us also assume the snmpEngineID of 12
octets:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02'H
If we now want to change the password to "newsyrup", then we first
calculate the key for the new password. It is as follows:
'3a 51 a6 d7 36 aa 34 7b 83 dc 4a 87 e3 e5 5e e4 d6 98 ac 71'H
If we localize it for the above snmpEngineID, then the localized new
key becomes:
'78 e2 dc ce 79 d5 94 03 b5 8c 1b ba a5 bf f4 63 91 f1 cd 25'H
If we then use a (not so good, but easy to test) random value of:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00'H
Then the value we must send for keyChange is:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
9c 10 17 f4 fd 48 3d 2d e8 d5 fa db f8 43 92 cb 06 45 70 51'
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 85]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
For the key used for privacy, the new nonlocalized key would be:
'3a 51 a6 d7 36 aa 34 7b 83 dc 4a 87 e3 e5 5e e4 d6 98 ac 71'H
For the key used for privacy, the new localized key would be (note
that they localized key gets truncated to 16 octets for DES):
'78 e2 dc ce 79 d5 94 03 b5 8c 1b ba a5 bf f4 63'H
If we then use a (not so good, but easy to test) random value of:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00'H
Then the value we must send for keyChange for the privacy key is:
'00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
'7e f8 d8 a4 c9 cd b2 6b 47 59 1c d8 52 ff 88 b5'H
B. Change Log
Changes made since RFC2574:
- Updated references
- Updated contact info
- Clarifications
- to first constraint item 1) on page 6.
- to usmUserCloneFrom DESCRIPTION clause
- to securityName in section 2.1
- Fixed "command responder" into "command generator" in last para of
DESCRIPTION clause of usmUserTable.
Changes made since RFC2274:
- Fixed msgUserName to allow size of zero and explain that this can
be used for snmpEngineID discovery.
- Clarified section 3.1 steps 4.b, 5, 6 and 8.b.
- Clarified section 3.2 paragraph 2.
- Clarified section 3.2 step 7.a last paragraph, step 7.b.1 second
bullet and step 7.b.2 third bullet.
- Clarified section 4 to indicate that discovery can use a userName
of zero length in unAuthenticated messages, whereas a valid
userName must be used in authenticated messages.
- Added REVISION clauses to MODULE-IDENTITY
- Clarified KeyChange TC by adding a note that localized keys must be
used when calculating a KeyChange value.
- Added clarifying text to the DESCRIPTION clause of usmUserTable.
Added text describes a recommended procedure for adding a new user.
- Clarified the use of usmUserCloneFrom object.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 86]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
- Clarified how and under which conditions the usmUserAuthProtocol
and usmUserPrivProtocol can be initialized and/or changed.
- Added comment on typical sizes for usmUserAuthKeyChange and
usmUserPrivKeyChange. Also for usmUserOwnAuthKeyChange and
usmUserOwnPrivKeyChange.
- Added clarifications to the DESCRIPTION clauses of
usmUserAuthKeyChange, usmUserOwnAuthKeychange, usmUserPrivKeyChange
and usmUserOwnPrivKeychange.
- Added clarification to DESCRIPTION clause of usmUserStorageType.
- Added clarification to DESCRIPTION clause of usmUserStatus.
- Clarified IV generation procedure in section 8.1.1.1 and in
addition clarified section 8.3.1 step 1 and section 8.3.2. step 3.
- Clarified section 11.2 and added a warning that different size
passwords with repetitive strings may result in same key.
- Added template users to appendix A for cloning process.
- Fixed C-code examples in Appendix A.
- Fixed examples of generated keys in Appendix A.
- Added examples of KeyChange values to Appendix A.
- Used PDU Classes instead of RFC1905 PDU types.
- Added text in the security section about Reports and Access Control
to the MIB.
- Removed a incorrect note at the end of section 3.2 step 7.
- Added a note in section 3.2 step 3.
- Corrected various spelling errors and typos.
- Corrected procedure for 3.2 step 2.a)
- various clarifications.
- Fixed references to new/revised documents
- Change to no longer cache data that is not used
Editors' Addresses
Uri Blumenthal
Lucent Technologies
67 Whippany Rd.
Whippany, NJ 07981
USA
Phone: +1-973-386-2163
EMail: uri@lucent.com
Bert Wijnen
Lucent Technologies
Schagen 33
3461 GL Linschoten
Netherlands
Phone: +31-348-480-685
EMail: bwijnen@lucent.com
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 87]
RFC 3414 USM for SNMPv3 December 2002
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Blumenthal & Wijnen Standards Track [Page 88]